Belarusian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Circuitry Assessment and Reinforcement Training Effects on Recovery

Перакладаць артыкулы могуць толькі зарэгістраваныя карыстальнікі
Увайсці / Зарэгістравацца
Спасылка захоўваецца ў буферы абмену
СтатусЯшчэ не завербаваны
Спонсары
Johns Hopkins University

Ключавыя словы

Рэферат

This study investigates if electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback training is more beneficial than sham feedback training for the improvement of communication, anxiety, and sleep quality in individuals with aphasia. Half of the participants will receive active EEG neurofeedback sessions first, followed by sham feedback sessions in a crossover design. The other half of participants will undergo sham feedback sessions first, followed by active neurofeedback.

Апісанне

Neurofeedback, a form of biofeedback, provides a visual and/or audio representation of an individual's neural electrical activity from live EEG recording. Using operant conditioning principles, individuals are trained to increase or reduce patterns of brainwave activity to modify behavior and performance. Although neurofeedback has not yet been investigated as a treatment for aphasia or other communication deficits due to stroke or neurodegenerative disease, it may be effective. Previous studies have observed improvement in cognitive and behavioral measures in those with conditions such as Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Furthermore, it has been associated with reduced anxiety and sleep disruption, which both exacerbate language and communication impairments. Research is needed to determine if neurofeedback may be an effective treatment for language disorders such as PPA and post-stroke communication disorders.

It is possible that EEG neurofeedback, which focuses on improving abnormal brainwave patterns, could provide certain therapeutic benefits to individuals with PPA or post-stroke aphasia, either by directly affecting neural networks that underlie language, or more generally by reducing anxiety and inattention through behavioral conditioning. Reduction of anxiety in neurological diseases can be beneficial not only for functional performance but also sleep duration and quality.

Даты

Апошняя праверка: 03/31/2020
Упершыню прадстаўлена: 02/26/2020
Меркаваная колькасць заявак прадстаўлена: 02/26/2020
Першае паведамленне: 03/01/2020
Апошняе абнаўленне адпраўлена: 04/08/2020
Апошняе абнаўленне апублікавана: 04/09/2020
Фактычная дата пачатку даследавання: 08/31/2020
Разліковая дата першаснага завяршэння: 08/31/2025
Разліковая дата завяршэння даследавання: 08/31/2025

Стан альбо хвароба

Aphasia
Primary Progressive Aphasia
Stroke

Ўмяшанне / лячэнне

Device: Active EEG Neurofeedback

Device: Sham Feedback

Фаза

-

Групы ўзбраенняў

РукаЎмяшанне / лячэнне
Experimental: Active EEG Neurofeedback
15 sessions of active EEG neurofeedback at a frequency of 3-5 sessions per week for a duration of 3-5 weeks.
Device: Active EEG Neurofeedback
Active EEG neurofeedback
Sham Comparator: Sham Feedback
15 sessions of sham neurofeedback at a frequency of 3-5 sessions per week for a duration of 3-5 weeks.
Device: Sham Feedback
Sham EEG feedback sessions identical to active sessions except that the feedback given to the participant will not be based on the individual's live EEG activity.

Крытэрыі прыдатнасці

Узрост, які мае права на вучобу 18 Years Каб 18 Years
Пол, прыдатны для навучанняAll
Прымае здаровых валанцёраўТак
Крытэрыі

Inclusion Criteria:

- Diagnosis of PPA or aphasia secondary to stroke and presence of naming deficits with confirmation of diagnosis by neurologist

- Capable of giving informed consent or indicating another to provide informed consent

- Age 18 or older.

- If aphasia is secondary to stroke, the stroke must have occurred between 6 months and 5 years prior to enrollment in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Lack of English proficiency

- Not medically stable

- Picture naming accuracy above 80% on the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT)

- Prior history of neurologic disease affecting the brain (e.g., brain tumor, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury) other than stroke or PPA and its underlying neurological pathologies: Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration or Dementia with Lewy bodies

- Prior history of severe psychiatric illness, developmental disorders or intellectual disability (e.g., PTSD, major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), autism spectrum disorders)

- Uncorrected severe visual loss or hearing loss by self-report and medical records

Вынік

Першасныя вынікі

1. Change in Number of content units expressed in the Picture Description Test [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Change in Number of content units expressed by the participant when describing what is seen in a picture.

Меры другаснага выніку

1. Change in number of items correctly named on the Philadelphia Naming Test [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Change in number of items correctly named on a behavioral picture naming assessment.

2. Change in Controlled Oral Word Association test (COWA) score [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

This is a measure of attention, executive function, and word-retrieval. COWA scores range from 0 to infinity. Lower scores represent more language impairment.

3. Change in quality of sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Change in quality of sleep measured with The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). This has 7 items with each item scored from 0 to 3. Overall score ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores representing poor sleep quality.

4. Change in anxiety as assessed by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Change in anxiety measured with State Trait Anxiety Inventory. This is a 40-item questionnaire scored on a 4 point likert scale (1-4). Overall score ranges from 40 to 160 with higher scores representing greater anxiety.

5. Change in Sleep Medication Dose [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Change in dose of sleep medication.

6. Change in Sleep Medication Frequency [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Change in frequency of sleep medication.

7. Change in absolute power on EEG [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Measurement of brainwave activity (absolute power in microvolts) in each frequency band (alpha, beta, theta, delta, gamma) on Quantitative EEG (qEEG).

8. Change in peak amplitude frequency on EEG [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Measurement of brainwave activity (peak amplitude frequency in hertz) in each frequency band (alpha, beta, theta, delta, gamma) on qEEG.

9. Change in EEG absolute power z-scores [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Comparison of z-scores for absolute power in each of the frequency bands (alpha, beta, theta, delta, gamma) pre- and post-interventions.

10. Change in EEG peak amplitude frequency z-scores [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Comparison of z-scores for peak amplitude frequency in each of the frequency bands (alpha, beta, theta, delta, gamma) pre- and post-interventions.

11. Change in EEG coherence z-scores [Baseline, 1 week following each intervention period and 8 weeks following both intervention periods]

Comparison of z-scores for coherence between EEG sites in each of the frequency bands (alpha, beta, theta, delta, gamma).

Далучайцеся да нашай
старонкі ў facebook

Самая поўная база дадзеных пра лекавыя травы, падтрыманая навукай

  • Працуе на 55 мовах
  • Лячэнне травой пры падтрымцы навукі
  • Распазнаванне траў па малюнку
  • Інтэрактыўная GPS-карта - пазначце травы па месцы (хутка)
  • Чытайце навуковыя публікацыі, звязаныя з вашым пошукам
  • Шукайце лекавыя зёлкі па іх уздзеянні
  • Арганізуйце свае інтарэсы і будзьце ў курсе навінавых даследаванняў, клінічных выпрабаванняў і патэнтаў

Увядзіце сімптом альбо захворванне і прачытайце пра зёлкі, якія могуць дапамагчы, набярыце траву і паглядзіце хваробы і сімптомы, супраць якіх яна выкарыстоўваецца.
* Уся інфармацыя заснавана на апублікаваных навуковых даследаваннях

Google Play badgeApp Store badge