Български
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

A randomized cross-over study comparing cabergoline and quinagolide in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic patients.

Само регистрирани потребители могат да превеждат статии
Вход / Регистрация
Линкът е запазен в клипборда
D A De Luis
A Becerra
M Lahera
J I Botella
Valero
C Varela

Ключови думи

Резюме

Quinagolide (QUI) and cabergoline (CAB) are dopamine agonists recently introduced for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. In the present study, these drugs have been compared in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Twenty patients (18 females and 2 males) with hyperprolactinemia (8 with microprolactinomas, 6 with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and 6 with empty sella turcica syndrome) were treated with oral QUI (75 microg once daily) and CAB (0,5 mg twice weekly), in a randomized cross-over trial with placebo between both drugs. Each drug was administered for 12 weeks, separated by other 12 weeks with placebo. PRL levels decreased with both drugs at 2 or 4 weeks of starting the treatment, without differences between both drugs at weeks 4, 8 and 12. At week 12, normal PRL levels (<20 ng/ml) were attained in 90% patients with CAB and only in 75% patients with QUI (p<0.05). After discontinuation of treatment, significant increase in serum PRL was higher after QUI withdrawal than after CAB. Clinical efficacy of both treatments was similar in terms of improvement amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, galactorrhea, and impotence. All patients completed both cycles of treatment, and the most frequent side-effects were nausea, headache and dizziness, without significant differences between CAB (30%) and QUI (55%). Our study indicates that, at the doses employed here, CAB showed a high percentage of patients with normal PRL at the end of treatment and long-lasting efficacy in the levels of PRL. Clinical response and side-effects were similar in both drugs.

Присъединете се към нашата
страница във facebook

Най-пълната база данни за лечебни билки, подкрепена от науката

  • Работи на 55 езика
  • Билкови лекове, подкрепени от науката
  • Разпознаване на билки по изображение
  • Интерактивна GPS карта - маркирайте билките на място (очаквайте скоро)
  • Прочетете научни публикации, свързани с вашето търсене
  • Търсете лечебни билки по техните ефекти
  • Организирайте вашите интереси и бъдете в крак с научните статии, клиничните изследвания и патентите

Въведете симптом или болест и прочетете за билките, които биха могли да помогнат, напишете билка и вижте болестите и симптомите, срещу които се използва.
* Цялата информация се базира на публикувани научни изследвания

Google Play badgeApp Store badge