Български
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
International Journal of Oncology 1994-Oct

Reliability of immunoradiometric assays for sex-hormone binding globulin, androstenedione, 17-Beta estradiol and tumor-markers cea and cb15.3 to assess the biological response of megestrol-acetate treatment in patients with advanced breast-cancer.

Само регистрирани потребители могат да превеждат статии
Вход / Регистрация
Линкът е запазен в клипборда
C Botti
A Bogni
E Seregni
G Vicario
R Buzzoni
C Carnaghi
L Celio
S Massaron
E Bombardieri
E Bajetta

Ключови думи

Резюме

This study evaluated the effect of megestrol acetate administration on the serological assessment of some sex steroid hormones in women with advanced hormone-sensitive breast cancer. The serum levels of 17-beta estradiol, androstenedione and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were measured by means of radioimmunometric assays, before and during drug administration. A significant suppressive effect on SHBG and androstenedione levels in comparison with the baseline values was reached in 100% (40/40) and 51% (20/39) of patients, respectively, after two months of therapy; by contrast, 17-beta estradiol levels showed an increase above the baseline levels in 18 out of 22 patients. These findings might be explained on the basis of a possible interference in vivo of megestrol acetate metabolites particularly in the estradiol assay, since a direct influence of the solubilized megestrol acetate was not observed in vitro. The hormone levels generally did not shaw any relationship with the course of the disease, so their serial determinations do not seem to be useful to assess the clinical status or evaluate response to therapy. In our group of patients, CEA and CA15.3 serum determinations were also carried out to monitor the efficacy of treatment. CEA and CA15.3 levels reflected the course of the disease in 58.9% (23/39) and 65.8% (25/38) of patients, respectively. The two tumor markers displayed a similar sensitivity in detecting cancer progression (64% CEA and 63% CA15.3), but CA15.3 seemed to have a better diagnostic value in evaluating the response to therapy and signalling tumor relapse.

Присъединете се към нашата
страница във facebook

Най-пълната база данни за лечебни билки, подкрепена от науката

  • Работи на 55 езика
  • Билкови лекове, подкрепени от науката
  • Разпознаване на билки по изображение
  • Интерактивна GPS карта - маркирайте билките на място (очаквайте скоро)
  • Прочетете научни публикации, свързани с вашето търсене
  • Търсете лечебни билки по техните ефекти
  • Организирайте вашите интереси и бъдете в крак с научните статии, клиничните изследвания и патентите

Въведете симптом или болест и прочетете за билките, които биха могли да помогнат, напишете билка и вижте болестите и симптомите, срещу които се използва.
* Цялата информация се базира на публикувани научни изследвания

Google Play badgeApp Store badge