Bosnian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Bier's Block Versus Systemic Analgesia

Samo registrirani korisnici mogu prevoditi članke
Prijavite se / prijavite se
Veza se sprema u međuspremnik
Status
Sponzori
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Ključne riječi

Sažetak

Background: There are three methods for procedural sedation in upper extremity traumas; systemic, regional and local anesthesia. There is controversy in the literature regarding the method of choice for this purpose.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare conscious sedation and Bier's block methods for pain reduction in upper extremity trauma patients.
Patients and Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated to either the Bier's block or the conscious sedation group. Pain reduction was assessed by a numerical rating scale; patients, surgeons and physicians responsible for analgesia satisfaction were assessed using a five-point Likert scale.
In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness, complications, duration, hemodynamic stability and patient and physician satisfaction between systemic analgesia and Bier's block method performed at the emergency department.

Opis

Patients and Methods

Study Design

This is a randomized clinical trial to be conducted at two tertiary health care centers, with census of 102000 and 60000 visits per year, during years 2017 and 2018. The study design has been approved by ethics committee of the university. Informed consents will be obtained from patients. And patients who refuse to participate in the study are excluded from the study and will receive analgesia based on the physician responsible for analgesia preference.

Population

All adult patients (aged 18 or more) with upper extremity trauma who need procedural analgesia in the ED are included in this study. Patients with a history of seizure, known allergy to analgesic substances, sickle cell anemia, peripheral vascular disease and arteriovenous fistula or infection in upper extremities are excluded from the study. Patients who need emergent intervention/s that last more than one hour are also excluded from the study. Randomization is done using sealed envelopes containing computer-generated block random allocation numbers.

Intervention

After introduction of the protocol of Bier's block (using 1.5 mg/kg of 0.5% lidocaine) or systemic analgesia (using ketamine 1.5 mg/kg), patients underwent the necessary procedure. Physicians who were responsible for the analgesia, had authority to change the method of analgesia in each group, if necessary.

Measurements

Patient's age, sex, site and type of injury, vital signs and pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be recorded before the introduction of analgesia. Patient's vital signs are documented at the end of the procedure. Satisfaction of the patient, surgeon and physician responsible for analgesia for the applied analgesic method is obtained before discharge from the ED operating room. Patients also score their level of pain before discharge and their vital signs are recorded at another instance. Time of initiation of analgesia, initiation of procedure, end of procedure, and gaining consciousness in systemic analgesia group and time of discharge from ED operating room are documented and patients will be discharged from the ED operating room when eligible.

Datumi

Posljednja provjera: 10/31/2017
Prvo podneseno: 11/10/2017
Predviđena prijava predata: 11/15/2017
Prvo objavljeno: 11/20/2017
Zadnje ažuriranje poslato: 11/15/2017
Posljednje ažuriranje objavljeno: 11/20/2017
Stvarni datum početka studija: 10/19/2017
Procijenjeni datum primarnog završetka: 12/31/2017
Predviđeni datum završetka studije: 03/31/2018

Stanje ili bolest

Distal Radius Fracture

Intervencija / liječenje

Procedure: Intravenous regional Analgesia

Drug: Systemic Analgesia

Faza

Faza 2

Grupe ruku

ArmIntervencija / liječenje
Experimental: Intravenous regional Analgesia
in this arm patients will receive intravenous regional anesthesia as infusion of mini dose (that is 1.5 mg/kg ) lidocaine 0.5% and immediately after procedure their torniquettes will be deflated (hence named Rapid MiniBier's block).
Procedure: Intravenous regional Analgesia
in this research patients will receive intravenous regional anesthesia as infusion of mini dose (that is 1.5 mg/kg ) lidocaine 0.5% and immediately after procedure their torniquettes (A.T.S. 2000, Zimmer, Inc., Bloomfield, CN) will be deflated (hence named Rapid MiniBier's block). the pain score will be assessed by NRS system before during and after the procedure.
Experimental: Systemic Analgesia
In this arm patients will receive ketamine 1-2 mg/kg IV slow as a systemic analgesia. ketamine as a PCP derivative has both hypnotic and analgesic effects.
Drug: Systemic Analgesia
in this group the patients will receive ketamine 1-2 mg/kg IV slow ( Bioniche,Ireland Ketamine Hydrochloride 500mg/10cc)and titrated to effect. again here the pain score will be assessed before procedure and after the procedure every 5 minutes until 30 minutes by NRS ( Numerical Rating Score)

Kriteriji prihvatljivosti

Uzrast podoban za studiranje 18 Years To 18 Years
Polovi podobni za studiranjeAll
Prihvaća zdrave volontereDa
Kriterijumi

Inclusion Criteria:

- All adult patients (aged 18 or more) with upper extremity trauma who need procedural analgesia

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with a history of seizure

- Known allergy to analgesic substances

- Sickle cell anemia,

- Peripheral vascular disease and arteriovenous fistula

- Infection in upper extremities

- Patients who need emergent intervention/s that last more than one hour are also excluded from the study.

Ishod

Primarne mjere ishoda

1. pain score [30 minutes since the beginning of procedure]

pain score assessed as numerical analogue score (NRS) with 1 for minimum and 10 for the maximum pain experienced by patient. A decrease of at least 13 millimeter will be considered as statistically meaningful.

Sekundarne mjere ishoda

1. Complications [30 minutes]

Seizure

Pridružite se našoj
facebook stranici

Najkompletnija baza ljekovitog bilja potpomognuta naukom

  • Radi na 55 jezika
  • Biljni lijekovi potpomognuti naukom
  • Prepoznavanje biljaka po slici
  • Interaktivna GPS karta - označite bilje na lokaciji (uskoro)
  • Pročitajte naučne publikacije povezane sa vašom pretragom
  • Pretražite ljekovito bilje po učincima
  • Organizirajte svoja interesovanja i budite u toku sa istraživanjem vijesti, kliničkim ispitivanjima i patentima

Upišite simptom ili bolest i pročitajte o biljkama koje bi mogle pomoći, unesite travu i pogledajte bolesti i simptome protiv kojih se koristi.
* Sve informacije temelje se na objavljenim naučnim istraživanjima

Google Play badgeApp Store badge