The role of the anterolateral thigh flap for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction.
Ključne riječi
Sažetak
OBJECTIVE
To elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of the anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction, we assessed this donor site and compared it with the radial forearm free flap (RFFF).
METHODS
Retrospective medical chart review.
METHODS
Tertiary care referral center.
METHODS
Twenty-three consecutive patients who underwent pharyngoesophageal reconstruction using an ALTF or RFFF.
METHODS
Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction.
METHODS
Patient medical charts were assessed for age, histopathological diagnosis, preoperative treatment, surgical defect, tracheoesophageal speech, flap survival, donor and recipient site complications, and swallowing function.
RESULTS
Twenty-three patients (12 who underwent reconstruction with ALTF and 11 with RFFF) were included in the study. Both donor sites provided adequate tissue for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction; however, the RFFF group demonstrated a higher rate of postoperative donor site complications including skin graft loss and extremity edema and stiffness. Postoperatively, the ALTF group demonstrated no gait disturbance and no donor site complications. All 23 patients in both groups were able to tolerate an unrestricted oral diet; however, 3 patients who underwent reconstruction with an RFFF experienced cervical esophageal stenosis, whereas only 1 patient with an ALTF experienced stenosis.
CONCLUSIONS
In this preliminary series, the ALTF represents an excellent source of tissue for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction and is associated with a lower rate of donor site morbidity and anastomotic stenosis compared with the RFFF donor site.
