Catalan
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020-Jan

Quality of periconceptional dietary intake and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Només els usuaris registrats poden traduir articles
Inicieu sessió / registreu-vos
L'enllaç es desa al porta-retalls
Lynn Yee
Robert Silver
David Haas
Samuel Parry
Brian Mercer
Jay Iams
Deborah Wing
Corette Parker
Uma Reddy
Ronald Wapner

Paraules clau

Resum

Periconceptional diet quality is commonly suboptimal and sociodemographic disparities in diet quality exist. However, it is unknown whether individual periconceptional diet quality is associated with obstetric outcomes.Our objective was to assess differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes according to maternal periconceptional diet quality.This is a secondary analysis of a large, multicenter prospective cohort study of 10,038 nulliparous women receiving obstetrical care at 8 United States centers. Women underwent three antenatal study visits and had detailed maternal and neonatal data abstracted by trained research personnel. In the first trimester (between 6 and 13 weeks), women completed the modified Block 2005 Food Frequency Questionnaire, a semiquantitative assessment of usual dietary intake for the 3 months around conception. Responses were scored using the Healthy Eating Index-2010, which assesses adherence to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Higher scores on the Healthy Eating Index represent better adherence. Healthy Eating Index scores were analyzed by quartile; quartile 4 represents the highest dietary quality. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess associations between diet quality and outcomes. A sensitivity analysis in which markers of socioeconomic status were included in the multivariable Poisson regression models was performed.In the cohort of 8,259 women with Healthy Eating Index data, the mean Healthy Eating Index score was 63 (± 13) of 100. Women with the lowest quartile Healthy Eating Index scores were more likely to be younger, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic, publicly insured, low income, and tobacco users. They were more likely to have comorbidities (obesity, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, mental health disorders), a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index, and less education. Women with lowest quartile scores experienced less frequent major perineal lacerations and more frequent postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, which persisted on multivariable analyses (controlling for age, body mass index, tobacco use, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, and mental health disorders) comparing women in each quartile to quartile 4. Additionally, women in quartiles 1 and 2 experienced greater adjusted relative risk of cesarean delivery compared to women in quartile 4. Neonatal outcomes also differed by dietary quartile, with women in the lowest Healthy Eating Index quartile experiencing greater adjusted relative risk of preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, small for gestational age infant, and low birthweight, and lower risk of macrosomia; all neonatal findings also persisted in multivariable analyses. The sensitivity analysis with inclusion of markers of socioeconomic status (race/ethnicity, insurance status, marital status) in the multivariable models supported these findings.Periconceptional diet quality among women in the United States is poor. Poorer periconceptional dietary quality is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes even after controlling for potential comorbidities and body mass index, suggesting periconceptional diet may be an important social or biological determinant of health underlying existing health disparities.

Uneix-te a la nostra
pàgina de Facebook

La base de dades d’herbes medicinals més completa avalada per la ciència

  • Funciona en 55 idiomes
  • Cures a base d'herbes recolzades per la ciència
  • Reconeixement d’herbes per imatge
  • Mapa GPS interactiu: etiqueta les herbes a la ubicació (properament)
  • Llegiu publicacions científiques relacionades amb la vostra cerca
  • Cerqueu herbes medicinals pels seus efectes
  • Organitzeu els vostres interessos i estigueu al dia de les novetats, els assajos clínics i les patents

Escriviu un símptoma o una malaltia i llegiu sobre herbes que us poden ajudar, escriviu una herba i vegeu malalties i símptomes contra els quals s’utilitza.
* Tota la informació es basa en investigacions científiques publicades

Google Play badgeApp Store badge