Strana 1 z 23 Výsledek
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of pure native aortic insufficiency is not routine clinical practice. Absent cusp calcification, missing landmarks in combination with no perfect valve control during release with first-generation TAVI devices resulted in a high rate
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. TAVI for native valve aortic regurgitation is technically more demanding because of a lack of anchoring calcification, a lower index incidence, heterogeneous causes, and larger
OBJECTIVE
This study sought to present the U.K. experience to date with the second-generation LOTUS bioprosthesis (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts).
BACKGROUND
First-generation transcatheter aortic valves have limitations. Second-generation repositionable valves may improve on some of those
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to evaluate the procedural and 30-day results for the repositionable Lotus valve in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation in a single-centre experience.
RESULTS
We prospectively enrolled 110 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis
Paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with worse long-term outcomes. The Lotus Valve incorporates an innovative Adaptive Seal designed to minimize PVL. This analysis evaluated the incidence and predictors of PVL after implantation of the Lotus
UNASSIGNED
The Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) is a contemporary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) device that is fully repositionable and retrievable to aid implantation and optimise procedural results. The ability to implant the device without routine pre-dilatation
Bioprosthesis degeneration is a relevant clinical issue that is increasingly developing with the higher expectancy of life. Its treatment may be further complicated by the presence of paravalvular leaks, which are usually consequence of tissue friability, annular calcification, and infection. The
As a result of recent randomised controlled trials and registry observations, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) enjoys growing appeal for the treatment of patients at high or extreme risk from surgical aortic valve replacement. However, the current technologies and techniques have
OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility of axillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Lotus valve.
BACKGROUND
TAVI is used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis, with transfemoral (TF) access being the safest and most widely used route. In patients unsuitable for this,
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis is a well-established and safe therapeutic option. However, data on TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis are limited and show a higher rate of moderate-severe aortic regurgitation compared with TAVI for tricuspid aortic
BACKGROUND
New generation devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement were optimized on valve positioning and reduction of residual aortic regurgitation. We compared 30-day, 12-month, and 24-month outcomes of the Boston Scientific Lotus valve (Lotus) and the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3
BACKGROUND
The rate of paravalvular aortic insufficiency (AI) with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with first generation devices was higher compared with surgical replacement. Residual AI after TAVI has been linked to an increased mortality rate. We compared two second generation TAVI
OBJECTIVE
We sought to compare using serial CMR, the quantity of AR and associated valve hemodynamics, following the first-generation CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and the second-generation Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA).
BACKGROUND
Aortic regurgitation (AR) following
The Lotus and SAPIEN3 are second-generation transcatheter heart valves, which are designed to minimize paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to compare both devices for valve performance and with emphasis on PAR by independent core