Deutsch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Nur registrierte Benutzer können Artikel übersetzen
Einloggen Anmelden
Der Link wird in der Zwischenablage gespeichert
StatusAbgeschlossen
Sponsoren
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
Mitarbeiter
Zeugma Saglik Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti.

Schlüsselwörter

Abstrakt

The aim of this study is to compare early postoperative outcomes of unselected consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under spinal versus general anesthesia.

Beschreibung

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard surgical treatment of symptomatic cholecystectomy which traditionally performed under general anesthesia. Laparoscopy has provided many advantages over open surgery for the patients; however, general anesthesia adversely affects patients' early postoperative quality of life (POQoL).

Spinal anesthesia which is a less invasive technique compared to general anesthesia has many advantages regarding the POQoL such as no need to wait for recovery from anesthesia, less nausea and vomiting, less or no pain at the end of surgery, no discomfort associated with intubation, early ambulation, fully awaken and oriented patient in the bed, and less anxious relatives.

LC has been shown to be feasible under spinal anesthesia if performed with proper technique. There are many reports demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of LC under spinal anesthesia in selected patients. However, patients with complicated gallstone disease such as acute, gangrenous or subacute cholecystitis have been considered as unfit cases for LC under spinal anesthesia because of technical difficulties. On the other hand, spinal anesthesia has also been regarded as inappropriate for patients complying with American society for anesthesiology (ASA) III and IV due to the uncontrolled anesthesia risks.

The aim of this study is to compare early postoperative outcomes of unselected consecutive patients underwent LC under spinal versus general anesthesia. If proportion of general anesthesia (PGA) / proportion of spinal anesthesia (PSA) denotes the proportion rate of outcomes in the general anesthesia group (GaG) / spinal anesthesia group (SaG), then two-sided test problem is assessed as follow:

1. Null hypothesis: H0: PGA = PSA. There is no difference between the two anesthesia techniques in terms of primary outcomes.

2. Null hypothesis: H1: PGA ≠ PSA There is a difference between the two anesthesia techniques in terms of primary outcomes.

Termine

Zuletzt überprüft: 10/31/2016
Zuerst eingereicht: 10/29/2016
Geschätzte Einschreibung eingereicht: 11/03/2016
Zuerst veröffentlicht: 11/06/2016
Letztes eingereichtes Update: 11/03/2016
Letztes Update veröffentlicht: 11/06/2016
Tatsächliches Startdatum der Studie: 05/31/2008
Geschätztes primäres Abschlussdatum: 05/31/2016
Voraussichtliches Abschlussdatum der Studie: 07/31/2016

Zustand oder Krankheit

Cholecystitis
Gallbladder Diseases

Intervention / Behandlung

Procedure: Spinal anesthesia group

Procedure: General anesthesia

Phase

-

Armgruppen

ArmIntervention / Behandlung
Spinal anesthesia group
patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia
Procedure: Spinal anesthesia group
Spinal anesthesia was used in patients who underwent LC
General anesthesia
Patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia
Procedure: General anesthesia
General anesthesia was used in patients who underwent LC

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigte GeschlechterAll
ProbenahmeverfahrenProbability Sample
Akzeptiert gesunde FreiwilligeJa
Kriterien

Inclusion Criteria:

- All patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease with no restriction for age, gender, ethnicity, disease severity, and ASA grade.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients were excluded if they underwent concurrent surgeries, had malignancy suspicion, received or converted to open surgery, and patients who were under spinal anesthesia converted to general anesthesia.

Ergebnis

Primäre Ergebnismaße

1. Change in pain level for the first day [from baseline to postoperative 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours]

Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used

2. Change in pain level for the first month [From postoperative 1 week to 1 month]

Numerical rating scale was used

Sekundäre Ergebnismaße

1. Complications [within the postoperative 1 month]

All types of complications were assessed

2. Mortality [within the postoperative 1 month]

all causes of mortality were recorded

3. Gastrointestinal quality of life index [change from baseline to postoperative 1 week and 1 month]

A standard form was used under the supervision of experienced independent personal

4. Patient satisfaction [at postoperative 1 month]

a verbal or visual scale was used

Treten Sie unserer
Facebook-Seite bei

Die vollständigste Datenbank für Heilkräuter, die von der Wissenschaft unterstützt wird

  • Arbeitet in 55 Sprachen
  • Von der Wissenschaft unterstützte Kräuterkuren
  • Kräutererkennung durch Bild
  • Interaktive GPS-Karte - Kräuter vor Ort markieren (in Kürze)
  • Lesen Sie wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen zu Ihrer Suche
  • Suchen Sie nach Heilkräutern nach ihrer Wirkung
  • Organisieren Sie Ihre Interessen und bleiben Sie über Neuigkeiten, klinische Studien und Patente auf dem Laufenden

Geben Sie ein Symptom oder eine Krankheit ein und lesen Sie über Kräuter, die helfen könnten, geben Sie ein Kraut ein und sehen Sie Krankheiten und Symptome, gegen die es angewendet wird.
* Alle Informationen basieren auf veröffentlichten wissenschaftlichen Forschungsergebnissen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge