English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Comparison Between Conventional vs. Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
StatusCompleted
Sponsors
Assiut University

Keywords

Abstract

This study is aimed to compare between the results of conventional lumbar discectomy and the newly used technique in our department; endoscopic lumbar discectomy in neurosurgery department Assiut university hospitals, so that we can offer our patients the best service in an updated and minimally invasive way.

Description

Lumbar discectomy is one of the most common operation performed worldwide for lumbar-related symptoms. Lumbar disc herniation accounts for only 5% of all low back pain problems but is the most common cause of radiating nerve root pain, sciatica.

Mixter and Barr described the first surgical procedure to remove the herniated lumbar disc in 1934 through a laminectomy and durotomy, with later enhancement by Semmes, who described approaching the herniated disc through hemilaminectomy and retraction of the dural sac. This became popularized as the "classical discectomy technique.

During the latter half of the 19th century, more techniques were developed to remove the herniated disc with minimal invasiveness. The first herniated disc excision using a microscope (microdiscectomy) was performed by Yasargil in 1977, which was the standard surgical procedure at the time In 1993, Mayer and Brock and then in 1997, Smith and Foley described endoscopic discectomy techniques. With these minimally invasive techniques, authors demonstrated decreased soft tissue manipulation, operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay, allowing early recovery.

In this study we try to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic translaminar discectomy at our hospital.

Dates

Last Verified: 11/30/2018
First Submitted: 04/18/2017
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 04/27/2017
First Posted: 05/01/2017
Last Update Submitted: 12/16/2018
Last Update Posted: 12/18/2018
Actual Study Start Date: 11/30/2016
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 04/30/2018
Estimated Study Completion Date: 07/31/2018

Condition or disease

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Intervention/treatment

Procedure: Conventional

Procedure: Endoscopic

Device: Endoscopic

Phase

-

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional
Patients in this arm will have conventional open lumbar discectomy operation.
Procedure: Conventional
Removal of single level lumbar disc herniation through conventional discectomy.
Active Comparator: Endoscopic
Patients in this arm will have Percutaneous Endoscopic Translaminar lumbar discectomy operation using Easy Go system Endoscopy
Procedure: Endoscopic
Removal of single level Lumbar disc herniation using endoscope.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study 18 Years To 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- single level, postero-lateral, denovo lumbar disc herniation including those with migrated and/or sequestrated discs.

- L4,5 &L5,S1 disc prolapse

- Failure of conservative management after 12 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

- central, far lateral, recurrent and/or multiple level disc herniation.

- Lateral recess stenosis or spondylolisthesis.

- presence of neurological deficit.

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Improvement of Preoperative low back pain and radicular pain. [Up to ten months post operative.]

Improvement of preoperative low back pain and radicular pain.Clinical outcomes will be measured using Visual Analogue Scale.

2. Functional Improvement [Up to ten months post operative.]

Functional Improvement using modified MacNab's criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Hospital stay. [up to one week.]

Time spent in hospital post operative.

2. Periprocedural complication. [Up to two weeks.]

Such as neurological deficit, Cerebro-Spinal fluid (CSF) leak, wound infection...etc.

3. Blood loss [intraoperative.]

Amount of blood loss intraoperative.

4. lumbo-sacral MRI [Up to six months]

Demonstration of any disc herniation recurrence.

5. Operative time [Intraoperative]

duration of operation

6. Wound length [Intraoperative]

Length of incision needed by surgeon to complete each approach

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge