English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone to Treat the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
StatusCompleted
Sponsors
Dr. Negrin University Hospital
Collaborators
Fundación Mutua Madrileña
Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica

Keywords

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no proven pharmacologic treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Great interest remains in the use of corticosteroids for the salvage of patients with severe acute lung injury in the early phase of their disease process, a situation that that has not been evaluated in most published trials. Dexamethasone has never been evaluated in ARDS in a randomized controlled fashion.
HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES: The investigators hypothesize that adjunctive treatment with intravenous dexamethasone of patients with established ARDS might change the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response and thereby will increase the number of ventilator-free days and will decrease the extremely high overall mortality. Our goal is to examine the effects of dexamethasone on length of duration of mechanical ventilation (assessed by number of ventilator-free days) and on mortality, in patients admitted into a network of Spanish intensive care units (ICUs) who still meet ARDS criteria at 24 hours after ARDS onset.

Description

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory disease process of the lungs as a response to both direct and indirect insults, characterized clinically by severe hypoxemia, reduced lung compliance, and bilateral radiographic infiltrates. ARDS is caused by an insult to the alveolar-capillary membrane that results in increased permeability and subsequent interstitial and alveolar edema. The mechanisms by which a wide variety of insults can lead to this syndrome are not clear. It is useful to think of the pathogenesis of ARDS as a result of two different pathways: a direct insult on lung cells and an indirect insult as a result of an acute systemic inflammatory response.

Like any form of inflammation, acute lung injury during ARDS represents a complex process in which multiple cellular signalling pathways can propagate or inhibit lung injury. Death has traditionally been attributed to the underlying disease, the presence of sepsis and the failure of vital organ systems other than the lung. The association of ARDS with multiple system organ dysfunctions is not inevitable, but it certainly is common. It is postulated that local injury to the lungs (pneumonia, trauma, aspiration, gas inhalation) could set up a secondary diffuse inflammatory response resulting in damage to other organs.

Although much has evolved in our understanding of its pathogenesis and factors affecting patient outcome, still there is no specific pharmacologic treatment for ARDS. Despite advances in supportive measures and antibiotics, ARDS has a mortality rate of about 40-50% in most series and it is associated with significant health care costs. Patients with ARDS invariably require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) to decrease the work of breathing and to improve oxygen transport. To date the only proven, widely accepted method of MV for ARDS is what is called "lung protective ventilation" using a low tidal volume strategy plus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

Corticoids seemed to be an ideal therapy for the acute lung injury in ARDS, given their potent anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties. They switch off genes that encode pro-inflammatory cytokines and switch on genes that encode anti-inflammatory cytokines. It has been reported that low doses of corticosteroids prevent an extended cytokine response and might accelerate the resolution of pulmonary and systemic inflammation in pneumonia.

Dexamethasone has never been evaluated in ARDS in a randomized controlled fashion. However, dexametasone has potent anti-inflammatory effects and weak mineralocorticoid effects compared with other corticosteroids. Dexamethasone has a long-lasting effect, allowing for a once-a-day regimen. Whether addition of dexamethasone to conventional supportive treatment benefits ARDS patients is unknown, it has been used in patients with sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, trauma, and meningitis, all of them causes of ARDS.

The investigators justify the need of our study based on the positive results of two recent clinical trials: (i) Meijvis et al (Lancet 2011) showed that dexamethasone (5 mg/day) for 4 days was able to reduce length of hospital stay in 304 patients with bacterial pneumonia when added to the conventional treatment; (ii) Azoulay et al (Eur Respir J 2011) showed that dexamethasone (10 mg/6h), when added to chemotherapy and conventional ICU management, caused less respiratory deterioration and lower ICU mortality in 40 patients with acute lung injury resulting from leukaemia.

Dates

Last Verified: 01/31/2019
First Submitted: 11/17/2012
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 11/20/2012
First Posted: 11/21/2012
Last Update Submitted: 02/13/2019
Last Update Posted: 02/17/2019
Actual Study Start Date: 03/27/2013
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 02/11/2019
Estimated Study Completion Date: 02/11/2019

Condition or disease

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Intervention/treatment

Drug: Dexamethasone

Phase

Phase 4

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
No Intervention: No dexamethasone
Patients will be treated with conventional treatment
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone
Conventional treatment plus dexamethasone
Drug: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone (20 mg/iv/daily/from Day 1 of randomization during 5 days, followed by 10 mg/iv/daily/ from Day 6 to 10 of randomization)

Eligibility Criteria

Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- Age ≥18 years old

- Patients must have acute onset of ARDS, as defined by the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) criteria for ARDS: (i) having an initiating clinical condition (pneumonia, aspiration, inhalation injury, sepsis, trauma, acute pancreatitis, etc.; (ii) bilateral infiltrates on frontal chest radiograph; (iii) absence of left atrial hypertension, a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) less than 18 mm Hg, or no clinical signs of left heart failure; (iv) severe hypoxemia (a PaO2/FIO2 <200 mm Hg, regardless of FIO2 or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)

- Be intubated and mechanically ventilated

- Have provided signed written informed consent from the patient or the patient's personal legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

- Be a woman known to be pregnant or lactating

- Take part in another experimental treatment protocol (simultaneously)

- Brain death

- Terminal-stage cancer or other terminal disease

- Having do-not-resuscitate orders

- Being immune-compromised

- Receiving corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs

- Patients in whom more than 24 hours had elapsed after initially meeting the AECC ARDS criteria before consent and results of initial standard ventilator settings could be obtained.

- Have severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

- Have congestive heart failure

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Ventilator free-days [28 days]

Number of ventilator free-days (VFDs) at Day 28 (defined as days alive and free from mechanical ventilation at day 28 after intubation. For subjects ventilated ≥28 days and for subjects who die, VFD is 0.

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Mortality [60 days]

All-cause mortality at Day 60 after enrolment.

Other Outcome Measures

1. organ failure [ICU discharge]

Number of extrapulmonary organ system failures

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge