English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

The SAFE-Trial: Awake Craniotomy Versus Surgery Under General Anesthesia for Glioblastoma Patients.

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
StatusRecruiting
Sponsors
Jasper Gerritsen
Collaborators
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
University Medical Center Groningen
Medical Center Haaglanden
Clinical Trial Center Erasmus MC

Keywords

Abstract

The trial is designed as a multicenter randomized controlled study. 246 patients with presumed Glioblastoma Multiforme in eloquent areas on diagnostic MRI will be selected by the neurosurgeons according the eligibility criteria (see under). After written informed consent is obtained, the patient will be randomized for an awake craniotomy (AC) (+/-123 patients) or craniotomy under general anesthesia (GA) (+/-123 patients), with 1:1 allocation ratio. Under GA the amount of resection of the tumour has to be performed within safe margins as judged by the surgeon during surgery. The second group will be operated with an awake craniotomy procedure where the resection boundaries for motor or language functions will be identified by direct cortical and subcortical stimulation. After surgery, the diagnosis of GBM will have to be histologically confirmed. If GBM is not histologically confirmed, patients will be considered off-study and withdrawn from the study. These patients will be followed-up according to standard practice. Thereafter, patients will receive the standard treatment with concomitant Temozolomide and radiation therapy and standard follow up. Total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is expected to take 4 years. Follow-up is 1 year after surgery. Statistical analysis, cost benefit analysis and article writing will take 3 months.

Description

Rationale Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) or Astrocytoma's grade IV (WHO) are devastating tumors with one of the worst prognoses in oncology. Extending resection improves survival in patients with GBM. Surgery of GBM nowadays is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) and resections are not as aggressive as possible, due to the chance of seriously damaging the patient with a rather low life expectancy. A surgical technique optimizing resection of the tumor in eloquent areas but preventing neurological deficits is necessary to improve survival and quality of life in these patients. Awake craniotomy (AC) with the use of cortical and subcortical stimulation is an alternative surgical technique that is standardly implemented in surgery for low grade glioma, but not yet for GBM. AC has shown to increase resection percentage and preserve quality of life in low grade glioma (LGG) and could be of important value in the surgery of GBM.

Objective The study is performed to increase safety and efficacy during surgery in patients with GBM in eloquent areas. This study will compare awake craniotomy with surgery under general anesthesia for patients with GBM near or in eloquent areas. Primary end points are: 1) Proportion of patients with NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) deterioration at 6 weeks post- surgery, where deterioration is defined as at least one point increase in total NIHSS score compared to baseline. 2) Proportion of patients without residual contrast-enhancing tumour on postoperative MRI. Secondary end points are: 1) Health related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after operation. 2) Progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months after operation. 3) Overall survival (OS) at 12 months after operation. 4) Frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Effects in each group: Infections, intracranial bleeding, epilepsy, aphasia, paresis/paralysis in arms or/and legs. Also, a cost benefit analysis will be performed.

Study design The trial is set up as a multicenter randomized controlled study. The study will include 246 patients in 5 neurosurgical centers in the Netherlands. Patients with GBM in eloquent areas on diagnostic MRI will be selected by the neurosurgeons according to the eligibility criteria. After informed consent the patient will be randomized for awake craniotomy (AC) or regular craniotomy under general anesthesia (GA) with 1:1 allocation ratio. After surgery, only patients with histologically proven GBM will continue with the study. Patients in whom no GBM could not be proven histologically, will be considered off-study. Thereafter, patients will receive the standard treatment with concomitant Temozolomide and radiation therapy and standard follow up. Total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years. Follow-up is 1 year.

Study population Patients aged 18-90 years old, with Glioblastoma Multiforme near or in eloquent areas and eligible for awake craniotomy.

Intervention Awake craniotomy compared to craniotomy under general anaesthesia

Main study parameters/endpoints

1. Proportion of patients with NIHSS deterioration at 6 weeks post-surgery

2. Proportion of patients without residual contrast-enhancing tumour on postoperative MRI

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness Patients have 50% chance to be randomized for an awake procedure. The risk-benefit-ratio of this procedure in patients with GBM is subject of this trial and the investigators expect less neurological morbidity than surgery under generalised anaesthesia. Three quality of life questionnaires and 1 neurological examination will take place preoperatively, 6 weeks after, 3 months after and 6 months after the surgery. The burden of this trial for the patient is therefore confined.

Dates

Last Verified: 02/28/2019
First Submitted: 02/27/2019
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 02/28/2019
First Posted: 03/03/2019
Last Update Submitted: 02/28/2019
Last Update Posted: 03/03/2019
Actual Study Start Date: 02/27/2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 03/05/2023
Estimated Study Completion Date: 03/03/2024

Condition or disease

Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain
Astrocytoma, Grade IV
Brain Tumor
Brain Cancer
Brain Neoplasms

Intervention/treatment

Procedure: Awake craniotomy

Procedure: Craniotomy under general anesthesia

Phase

-

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
Experimental: Awake craniotomy
Cortical stimulation is performed with a bipolar electrical stimulator. The Boston naming test and repetition of words is done in cooperation with a neuropsychologist/linguist, who will inform the neurosurgeon of any kind of speech arrest or dysarthria. When localizing the motor and sensory cortex, the patient is asked to report any unintended movement or sensation in extremities or face. Functional cortical areas are marked with a number. When the tumour margins or white matter is encountered or when on regular neuronavigation the eloquent white matter tracts are thought to be in close proximity, subcortical stimulation (biphasic currents of 8-16 mA, pulse frequency 60 Hz, single pulse phase duration of 100 microsec., 2-second train) is performed to localize functional tracts.
Procedure: Awake craniotomy
Awake craniotomy
Active Comparator: Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Trephination and tumour resection are performed without any additional neuro-psychological monitoring or brain mapping, guided by STEALTH-neuronavigation.
Procedure: Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Craniotomy under general anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study 18 Years To 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥18 years and ≤ 90 years

2. Tumor diagnosed as Glioblastoma Multiforme on MRI with distinct ring-like pattern of contrast enhancement with thick irregular walls and a core area reduced signal suggestive of tumour necrosis as assessed by the surgeon

3. Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract or speech areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)

4. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)

5. Karnofsky performance scale 80 or more

6. Written Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brain stem or midline

2. Multifocal contrast enhancing lesions

3. Substantial non-contrast enhancing tumor areas suggesting low grade gliomas with malignant transformation

4. Medical reasons precluding MRI (eg, pacemaker)

5. Inability to give consent because of or language barrier

6. Psychiatric history

7. Previous brain tumour surgery

8. Previous low-grade glioma.

9. Second primary malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of any organ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

10. Severe aphasia or dysphasia

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Postoperative neurological morbidity [Between operation and 6 weeks postoperatively]

Proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks post-surgery, where deterioration is defined as at least one point increase in total NIHSS score compared to baseline

2. Proportion of gross-total resections [Assessed on 48 hours postoperative scan]

Proportion of patients without residual contrast-enhancing tumour on postoperative MRI, where residual tumour is defined as contrast-enhancement with a volume more than 0.175 cm3.

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D questionnaire [Between baseline and 6 weeks/3 months/6 months postoperatively]

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after operation, where HRQol is measured with the EQ-5D questionnaire

2. Health-related quality of life assessed by EORTC-QLQ-BN20 questionnaire [Between baseline and 6 weeks/3 months/6 months postoperatively]

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after operation, where HRQol is measured with the EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaire

3. Health-related quality of life assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire [Between baseline and 6 weeks/3 months/6 months postoperatively]

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after operation, where HRQol is measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire

4. Progression-free survival [Between surgery and 12 months postoperatively]

Progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months defined as time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumour lesion with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumour volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first

5. Overall survival [Between surgery and 12 months postoperatively]

Overall survival (OS) at 12 months defined as time from diagnosis to death from any cause

6. Postoperative (serious) adverse events [Between surgery and 6 weeks postoperatively]

Frequency and severity of (Serious) Adverse Effects in each group: Infections, intracerebral hemorrhage, epilepsy, aphasia, paresis/paralysis in arms or/and legs

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge