English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Etomidate vs Propofol-Induction Characteristics

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
StatusCompleted
Sponsors
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences

Keywords

Abstract

The ideal induction agent for day care surgery should have properties of rapid, smooth induction, better haemodynamic profile, faster recovery and devoid of side effects in the form of pain on injection, involuntary movements, respiratory depression and post-operative nausea/vomiting. Propofol is the drug being used for day care surgeries because of its rapid, smooth induction and faster recovery. But its use is associated with pain on injection (even with added lidocaine), hypotension and respiratory depression. So the need for an agent with better hemodynamic control and lesser side effects was felt. The introduction of etomidate lipuro revolutionised the anaesthesia practice. It possesses many of the properties of an ideal induction agent. This newer formulation of etomidate in lipid emulsion i.e. etomidate lipuro is known to have rapid, smooth induction, haemodynamic stability and lesser side effects than older etomidate with propylene glycol (hypnomidate).
Hence, investigators devised a prospective randomized controlled open trial and compared this newer lipid formulation of etomidate with propofol in terms of - induction time, haemodynamic parameters and side effect profile.

Description

The administration of a suitable drug by intravenous route for induction of anaesthesia has been an important component of anaesthetic management.The ability to deliver safe and effective anaesthesia with minimal side effects and rapid recovery is critically important to ensure safe and early discharge. An ideal intravenous (IV) anaesthetic agent should, have rapid onset, rapid recovery, be without undesirable cardiac and respiratory depression and lesser untoward effects like pain on injection, nausea, vomiting etc.No single drug is ideal.

Propofol (propofol 1%) has a smooth and rapid induction, rapid recovery, cerebro-protective effect but it causes hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression pain on injection.Etomidate is a hypnotic agent causing minimal histamine release and very stable hemodynamic profile. In the present study, investigators evaluated the induction characteristics and side effect profile of this newer lipid formulation of etomidate and compared it with propofol in same lipid formulation.

Material and Methods: Hundred ASA I & II patients in the age group 18-60 yrs, scheduled for dilatation and curettage procedure were randomly allocated in two groups based on induction agent Etomidate lipuro or Propofol.

Both groups received intravenous midazolam 0.02mg /kg and fentanyl 2 µg /kg as premedication. After induction with the desired agent titrated to bispectral index Entropy 40, the time to achieve BIS values to 40 (BIS 40 time) were measured. Heart rate, mean arterial pressures were recorded at baseline, induction and upto 10 minutes. Patients were asked for pain at the injection site, postoperative nausea and observed visually for myoclonus, apnea and thrombophlebitis.

Dates

Last Verified: 05/31/2016
First Submitted: 06/08/2016
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 06/19/2016
First Posted: 06/20/2016
Last Update Submitted: 06/19/2016
Last Update Posted: 06/20/2016
Actual Study Start Date: 02/28/2011
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 03/31/2013
Estimated Study Completion Date: 03/31/2013

Condition or disease

Hemodynamics
Side Effects

Intervention/treatment

Drug: Inj Etomidate

Drug: IV Propofol and IV Etomidate lipuro

Drug: IV Etomidate Lipuro and Placebo

Phase

Phase 4

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
Experimental: IV Propofol and IV Etomidate lipuro
After premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg kg-1, IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1, Group P Patients received IV Propofol 2mg kg-1 slowly over 60 seconds till Entropy of 40 as a comparator agent in patients undergoing Medical termination of pregnancy(MTP) and Group ' E' Patients received IV Etomidate Lipuro 0.3mg kg-1 slowly over 60 seconds till Entropy of 40 as intervention agent in patients undergoing MTP
Drug: IV Propofol and IV Etomidate lipuro
Induction of anesthesia using IV Propofol 2mg kg-1 as a single dose in patients undergoing day care procedure, after premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg kg-1 and IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1
Active Comparator: IV Etomidate Lipuro and Placebo
After premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg kg-1, IV Fentanyl 2ug kg-1, Group ' E' Patients received IV Etomidate Lipuro 0.3mg kg-1 slowly over 60 seconds till Entropy of 40 as intervention agent in patients undergoing MTP and placebo group received normal saline
Drug: IV Etomidate Lipuro and Placebo
After premedication with IV midazolam 0.2mg/kg and IV Fentanyl 2ug/kg Placebo was given.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study 18 Years To 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for StudyFemale
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- ASA I and II Female patients

- Elective Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- Hemo-dynamically unstable patients

- Allergic to egg protein

- Patients with epilepsy

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Heart rate per minute [Change in Heart rate per minute from baseline value every five minutes for 30 minutes.]

Mean of Heart rate per minute at above mentioned time intervals was measured and any study drug causing bradycardia (Heart rate <50 was noted .

2. Mean Arterial Pressure [Change in Mean Arterial Pressure(MAP) in mm of Hg from baseline value every 5 minutes for 30 minutes]

Mean value of Mean Arterial Pressures(Summation of MAP divided by number of patients) at above mentioned time intervals was noted and study drug causing Hypotension(MAP< 90mm of Hg) was noted.

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Side effects of the drugs in the form of Pain on injection [2 minutes after injection of study drug.]

0. No pain. I. Verbal complaint of pain. II. Withdrawal of arm. III. Both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm. 0. No pain. I. Verbal complaint of pain. II. Withdrawal of arm. III. Both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm. 0. No pain. I. Verbal complaint of pain. II. Withdrawal of arm. III. Both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm. Pain on injection was measured using scale as 0 no pain,1verbal complaint to pain,2 withdrawal of arm,3 both verbal complaint and withdrawal of arm

2. Myoclonic movements [60 seconds after injection of study drug]

Using Myoclonus scale as 0.No myoclonic movement. I. Minor myoclonic movement. II. Moderate myoclonic movement. III. Major myoclonic

3. Thrombophlebitis [24 hours postoperatively]

Presence or absence of inflammation of vein through which the drug was injected.

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge