Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients

INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a frequently applied and often a life-saving strategy in neurocritically ill patients. Paradoxically, ventilation itself has the potential to cause further pulmonary and cerebral damage and can increase mortality and morbidity [1].

The so-called 'protective lung ventilation' strategies include the use of low tidal volume (TV), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), and eventually recruitment maneuvers (RMs), and are aimed to prevent lung damage and to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [2]. In particular, low tidal volume seems to have the greater importance [3-5], and guidelines strongly recommend its use in critically ill patients with ARDS [6].

Results from one multicenter randomized controlled trial suggest that also ICU patients without ARDS could benefit from 'protective lung ventilation strategies [7]. A recent meta-analysis showed a higher incidence of pulmonary complications and even increased mortality in patients who received 'conventional ventilation' with traditionally sized or higher tidal volumes compared to patients undergoing protective strategies [8].

Present ventilation guidelines for patients with acute brain injury The fourth edition of the Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [10] suggests maintaining normocapnia in this subset of patients and aiming for peripheral saturation of oxygen higher than 90% to guarantee an adequate cerebral perfusion and avoid secondary brain damages due to hypoxia or inappropriate cerebral vasodilatation [10]. However, BTF guidelines do not provide any advice on ventilator settings or targets. There is still uncertainty regarding the use of protective ventilation in neurologically ill patients. Brain injured patients have been traditionally excluded from the major trials regarding mechanical ventilation and the use of lung protective ventilator strategies because low tidal volumes, high PEEP and RMs can increase carbon dioxide levels (CO2) and increase intrathoracic pressure, thus having detrimental effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).

METHODS

Objectives

This observational study aims to determine the ventilation practice of consecutive intubated and ventilated neuro-ICU patients in the first week from admission in intensive care units.

Hypotheses

- In patients with acute brain injury, protective ventilation strategies are not often applied; in particular, tidal volumes are higher than those used in patients with no brain injury. The adoption of protective ventilation in this group of patients might result in a beneficial effect on outcome.

- Ventilation practice, in particular tidal volume size, varies among patients with acute brain injury and among different centers and different countries.

- In patients with acute brain injury outcomes can be dependent on ventilator setting.

Study design

International multicenter prospective observational study of consecutive ventilated neuro-ICU patients in the first week since admission to ICU.

Study population

We will collect data of consecutive patients with acute brain injury intubated and ventilated, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Sample size calculation

The primary endpoint of the study is the exploration of the ventilator settings in clinical practice in braininjured patients. The hypotheses of the study are exploratory; hence a sample size calculation has not been conducted. This international prospective observational study aims to recruit>3000 patients in coma after acute brain damage admitted to >200 Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Recruitment will last 12 weeks at each center, aiming to enroll about 20 patients/center. To avoid any overrepresentation of some centers we ceil the data collection to 30 patients/center. This number of enrolled patients and ICUs reflects an adequate sample size to capture a range of variation in practice between ICUs. We aim to include also low-middle income countries, in order to have a representation of the variability worldwide.

Follow-up/Outcomes

Enrolled patients will be followed until ICU-discharge or death (whatever comes first), for collection of patient demographics (on day of admission), and ventilation characteristics (from start of ventilation till stop of ventilation). At 6 months, data on length of hospital stay and outcome (Extended Glasgow Coma Scale) will be collected.

Outcomes will be assessed as:

- 6-months mortality and neurological outcome (as for extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, eGOS)

- Hospital length of stay (in days), in hospital mortality.

- Mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (in days), ventilator free days (days) at ICU discharge.

Study procedures

Patients in participating centers are screened on a daily basis. ICU-patients under mechanical ventilation and with diagnosis of acute brain injury will be included. Demographic data on screened patients regardless of meeting enrollment criteria will be recorded (registry).

The inclusion period will be flexible for participating centers and determined at a later stage together with the study-coordinator.

Times points of data collection

- Demographic data and baseline data, including severity scores (e.g. APACHE II- scores and SAPS III) will be collected from clinical files on the day of start of mechanical ventilation.

- Ventilation settings, gas exchange variables and vital parameters will be collected once daily in the morning till the day when ventilation is stopped or till day 7, whichever comes first.

- Chest radiography data from available chest X-rays (i.e., no extra chest X-rays are obtained) in the first week.

- Lung echography data are collected from clinical files in the first week.

- Predefined complications are recorded from medical chart (Appendix 1)

- At ICU discharge: mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (in days), ventilator free days (days).

- At 6-months: mortality and neurological outcome (as for extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, eGOS), length of stay (in days), in hospital mortality.

Inclusion During a 3 months period, all admitted patients will be screened daily by a local investigator.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Patient characteristics will be compared and described by appropriate statistics. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests will be used to compare continuous variables and chi-squared tests will be used for categorical variables. Data will be expressed as means (SD), medians (interquartile range) and proportions as appropriate. Comparisons between and within groups will be performed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analyses for continuous variables.

Plan of analysis The primary analysis will concern the determination of (variation of) the ventilator settings in neurologically critically ill patients. Univariate analysis will be performed to identify potential factors associated with outcomes including, but not limited to, GOS, mortality, duration of ventilation, or hospital LOS. A multivariate logistic regression model will be used to identify independent risk factors. A stepwise approach will be used to enter new terms into the model, with a limit of p < 0.2 to enter the terms. Time to event variables will be analyzed using Cox regression and visualized by Kaplan-Meier. Statistical analyses will be conducted using R. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Ethical standards The PI and Steering Committee will ensure that this study is conducted in full conformity with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practices.

Ethics committee Each NC/PI will notify the relevant ethics committee, in compliance with the local legislation and rules. The national coordinators will facilitate this process. The approval of the protocol (if required by local authorities) must be obtained before any participant is enrolled. Any amendment to the protocol will require review and approval by the SC before the changes are implemented to the study.

Lack of capacity and Delayed Consent Informed consent will be obtained from patients with no lack of capacity. For patients not be able to provide informed consent at the time of recruitment, the responsible clinical/research staff will act as Consulter and consent eligible patients after discussion with the next- of-kin.If the patient has a Power of Attorney or a Legal tutor or an, he/she will act as Consultee and will be asked to consent/decline participation to the study on legal behalf of the patient.

If patients have Advance Decision Plan including participation in research studies the Plan will be respected and recruitment pursued/abandoned accordingly. At follow-up, patients who have regained capacity will be asked to provide Informed Consent and will be given the possibility to:

- Provide Informed Consent for the acute data and follow-up.

- Deny research participation and request destruction of acute data collected.

Expected impact of the study The investigators expect to obtain data of >3000 patients admitted to ICU. These data will allow a detailed description of patient's characteristics, management strategies resource use and correlation with clinical outcomes. In particular, the study will provide insights in relation to clinical management, monitoring and treatment, practice variation in neurointensive care units around the world, differences in the ventilator management of brain injured patients and their potential association with outcome.