English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Obesity: Cesarean Health by Incision Placement

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
Status
Sponsors
Thomas Jefferson University

Keywords

Abstract

Hypothesis: A Pfannenstiel cesarean skin incision placed under the pannus (should a pannus exist) will have a higher maternal morbidity composite rate than a Cohen cesarean skin incision placed above the pannus (should a pannus exist).

Description

Introduction: Obesity affects approximately 1/3rd of all reproductive-aged women and is associated with increased maternal morbidity during and after cesarean section. The optimal surgical approach has not been well elucidated for obese individuals.

Materials and Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial comparing a Pfannenstiel incision placed below the pannus (should a pannus exist) with a Cohen incision placed above the pannus (should a pannus exist); allocation is 1:1 with stratification for pre-gestational diabetes and presence of pannus. The study will be assessed by intention-to-treat analysis looking composite maternal morbidity (wound complications within 6 weeks, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage) as the primary outcome with secondary outcomes including wound complications, operative time, estimated blood loss, pain management, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Significant confounders will be assessed and adjusted in the multiple regression analysis accordingly.

Results: The investigators propose the Cohen cesarean incision will result in statistically less maternal morbidity from cesarean section than the Pfannenstiel incision.

Comment: The benefits of a Cohen incision have been encouraged in non-obese pregnant women; the investigators propose that they be considered in obese women as well.

Dates

Last Verified: 06/30/2018
First Submitted: 09/15/2016
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 09/15/2016
First Posted: 09/20/2016
Last Update Submitted: 07/08/2018
Last Update Posted: 07/09/2018
Actual Study Start Date: 08/31/2016
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 08/31/2019
Estimated Study Completion Date: 08/31/2019

Condition or disease

Maternal Morbidity

Intervention/treatment

Procedure: Cohen Incision

Phase

-

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
No Intervention: Pfannenstiel Incision
This curved incision is approximately 10-15 cm long and 2 cm above the pubic symphysis. If a pannus is present, the pannus should be retracted up (see diagram) to allow placement of the Pfannenstiel incision.
Experimental: Cohen Incision
This is a straight transverse incision through the skin, 3 cm below the level of the anterior superior iliac spines (higher than the Pfannenstiel incision). Should a pannus exist, the pannus should be left in the physiologic location (not retracted) to allow placement of the incision.
Procedure: Cohen Incision
This is a straight transverse incision through the skin, 3 cm below the level of the anterior superior iliac spines (higher than the Pfannenstiel incision). Should a pannus exist, the pannus should be left in the physiologic location (not retracted) to allow placement of the incision.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study 16 Years To 16 Years
Sexes Eligible for StudyFemale
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- BMI > or = 35 kg/m2 at time of presentation for delivery

- Speaks English

Exclusion Criteria:

- BMI < 35 kg/m2 at time of presentation or delivery

- Unable to consent (including language spoken other than English)

- Prior abdominal incisions or obstetric factors necessitating placement of incision in specified location, at the discretion of the attending surgeon

- Infection present (ie cellulitis) precluding incision placement at one of the randomization sites

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Composite Maternal Morbidity [18 months]

To compare composite maternal morbidity (wound complications within 6 weeks including cellulitis, wound abscess, wound separation or dehiscence, hematoma, seroma formation, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage), by placement type of transverse Cesarean skin incision in individuals with BMI >35 kg/m2.

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Composite maternal morbidity (as above) by stage of pannus [18 months]

2. Composite wound complication rates (cellulitis, wound abscess, wound separation or dehiscence, hematoma, seroma) [18 months]

3. Length in minutes of operative time from time of skin incision to time of delivery of the neonate [18 months]

4. Length in minutes of total operating time (from time of skin incision to the completion of closure of the skin incision) [18 months]

5. Patient satisfaction (via two questions, Likert scale) [18 months]

6. Severity of pain (via Likert scale) and amount of pain medications utilized in the first 48 hours post procedure [18 months]

7. Estimated blood loss (in milliliters) [18 months]

8. Incidence of low transverse uterine incisions (hysterotomy) with all other types of uterine incisions (vertical, high transverse, etc). [18 months]

9. Attending surgeon satisfaction (on 1-10 Likert scale) with feasibility of surgery by incision type [18 months]

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge