English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Side Effects of Mandibular Advancement Devices

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
StatusRecruiting
Sponsors
University Medicine Greifswald

Keywords

Abstract

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SBAS) are one of the most common causes of non-restorative sleep.
Sleep therapy options include positive pressure ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks, mandibular advancement of the mandible with mandibular advancement devices (MAD), back restraining, weight reduction, ear, nose and throat surgical procedures, bimaxillary or mandibular remodeling osteotomies, and neurostimulation procedures N. hypoglossal. In mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), MAD, back suppression and weight reduction are potential treatment options. This study aims to identify possible side effects in the temporomandibular system that occur during nocturnal support of a mandibular arch over two years. Two different MADs are compared in terms of construction, height (bite elevation) and protrusion mechanics: the H-MAD with an hinge system according to Herbst and the SomnoDent Fusion ™ MAD (called F-MAD) with sliding side wings.
In addition, it is to be evaluated whether hinge system according to Herbst as a protrusion-controlling element and the reduction of the splint body for a reduced bite elevation leads to a significant reduction of side effects compared to the F-MAD.

Description

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SBAS), particularly obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), are one of the most common causes of non-restorative sleep. Disturbances of sleep disorders include apneas and hypopneas associated with either or not pharyngeal obstruction and hypoventilation. Depending on the type of respiratory disorder present, they are associated with hypoxemia and may cause hypercapnia or acidosis The consequences of obstructive narrowing of the pharynx are far-reaching. Studies have shown that patients with OSAS have comorbidities such as neurological complaints, heart attacks, dementia, cardiovascular complaints, myocardial infarction, and a higher mortality rate.

Sleep fragmentation caused by respiratory disorders during sleep and wakefulness reactions (arousals) can lead to daytime sleepiness and concentration disorders. In the longer term untreated arousals and apneas are associated with an increased risk for arterial hypertension, stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus and libido loss.

OSAS management includes positive pressure ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks, mandibular advancement of the mandible with mandibular advancement devices (MAD), weight loss, ear, nose and throat surgical procedures, bimaxillary or mandibular remodeling osteotomies, and neurostimulation procedures of the hypoglossal nerve.

Several studies have shown that the use of MADs is inferior in reducing the severity of OSAS in comparison to CPAP therapy, but its efficacy is comparable and preferred by patients in mild to moderate OSAS.

Due to the forward displacement of the lower jaw for several hours at night, similar symptoms as in temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) patients may occur. The symptoms may be pain or stiffness on the masticatory muscles or temporomandibular joints.

This study aims to identify possible side effects in the temporomandibular system that occur during the course of two years of nocturnal MAD delivery. Two different appliance systems are compared in terms of construction height (bite elevation) and protrusion mechanics: the H-MAD ™ with a hinge system according to Herbst and the SomnoDent Fusion ™ (called F-MAD) with sliding side wings.

Dates

Last Verified: 05/31/2020
First Submitted: 07/31/2019
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 08/05/2019
First Posted: 08/07/2019
Last Update Submitted: 06/14/2020
Last Update Posted: 06/15/2020
Actual Study Start Date: 11/30/2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 11/30/2022
Estimated Study Completion Date: 12/20/2022

Condition or disease

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Temporomandibular Disorders

Intervention/treatment

Device: H-MAD with a hinge system according to Herbst

Phase

-

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
Experimental: H-MAD, hinge system according to Herbst
Patients with snoring and OSAS. Therapy with MAD type H-MAD with lateral hinges according to Herbst. Bite elevation 2 mm interocclusal distance with a lower jaw advancement of 5 mm
Active Comparator: F-MAD, SomnoDent Fusion
Patients with snoring and OSAS,Fusion MAD with sliding side wings (F-MAD). Bite elevation 5 mm interocclusal distance with a lower jaw advancement of 5 mm

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study 18 Years To 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with medical indication for mandibular protrusion (MAD) due to OSAS

- therapy request for snoring

- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35

- mandibular protrusion of 5 mm possible

- at least 8 remaining teeth or 4 implants per jaw

- fixed dentures and stable

- removable partial denture, at least support up to the area of the 2nd premolars on both sides

- business ability and the existence of the signed declaration of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- polyarthritis

- fibromyalgia, neuralgia

- central sleep apnea syndrome

- untreated generalized periodontitis

- chronic dysfunctional pain degree 3-4

- long-term use of psychotropics and analgesics (> 4 weeks)

- pregnancy

- participation in another interventional clinical study (currently up to three months before inclusion)

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. change orofacial pain: numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

change of orofacial pain after applying the MAD measured by numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10, 0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. pressure pain points on palpation [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

number of pressure pain points on palpation of the masticatory muscles and in the area of the temporomandibular joints according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD)

2. number of posterior contact points [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

change of the number of occluding posterior teeth

Other Outcome Measures

1. change in sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, 0-21, < 5: good sleep) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

change in sleep quality after applying the MAD measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index retrospectively asks for a four-week period the incidence of sleep disturbing events, sleep quality assessment, sleep habits, sleep latency and sleep duration, sleeping medication use.

2. change in daytime sleepiness: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS, 0-24, <11 no daytime sleepiness) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

Change in daytime sleepiness measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale. ESS is a short questionnaire for the detection of daytime sleepiness. (ESS, 0-24, <11 no daytime sleepiness)

3. change in oral health-related quality of life: Oral Health Impact profile (OHIP-5) (0-20) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

Oral Health Impact profile (OHIP-5) is a measurement tool for assessing the oral health-related quality of life in adults. It consists of 5 questions for functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, social disability

4. change in chronic pain: Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) questionnaire (0-4) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) questionnaire records pain intensity and the presence of functional or dysfunctional chronic pain. Three subscale scores (characteristic pain intensity, disability score, and the disability points score) are used to classify subjects into 1 of the 5 pain severity grades: grade 0 for no pain, grade 1displays low disability, low intensity, grade 2 displays low disability but high intensity, grade 3 displays high disability,moderately limiting and grade 4 displays high disability and severely limiting.

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge