English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

The Confounding Burden of Psychological Impairments in Cervical Spine Surgery

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
StatusRecruiting
Sponsors
NYU Langone Health

Keywords

Abstract

This is a single-center prospective randomized investigation of patients undergoing surgical arthrodesis for single or multi-level cervical disease, resulting in cervical radiculopathy. Patients indicated for surgery for cervical degenerative disease (CDD) will be screened for yellow flags using validated tools to assess pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) will be used to modify yellow flags in spine patients. All patients at risk will be stratified by risk rating and randomly assigned to 2 groups; sham treatment (N=20) or CBT (N=20). The goal of this study is to unmask the relationship between psychological distress and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for cervical degenerative disease resulting in combinations of neck pain and radiculopathy, and to determine the effectiveness of a brief psychological intervention on subset of patients who screen positive for psychological distress prior to their surgeries.

Dates

Last Verified: 04/30/2020
First Submitted: 06/07/2017
Estimated Enrollment Submitted: 06/07/2017
First Posted: 06/11/2017
Last Update Submitted: 05/25/2020
Last Update Posted: 05/26/2020
Actual Study Start Date: 06/04/2017
Estimated Primary Completion Date: 12/29/2020
Estimated Study Completion Date: 12/29/2020

Condition or disease

Cervical Spine Disease
Psychological Impairment

Intervention/treatment

Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Behavioral: Sham Treatment

Phase

-

Arm Groups

ArmIntervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Comparison Group
Patients with a zero risk score will serve as a comparison group (N=20).
Active Comparator: Sham Treatment
All patients at risk will be stratified by risk rating and randomly assigned to 2 groups; sham treatment (N=20) or CBT (N=20).
Behavioral: Sham Treatment
Study nurse will conduct six sessions (30 minutes/ session) over a 4-8 week time period. The first session will be performed in person, and the subsequent 5 sessions will be performed over the phone. Sham sessions will entail how to prepare for surgery and expectations for recovery, and will go over content that the treatment and control groups will receive in handout form.
Active Comparator: CBT
All patients at risk will be stratified by risk rating and randomly assigned to 2 groups; sham treatment (N=20) or CBT (N=20).

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study 18 Years To 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for StudyAll
Accepts Healthy VolunteersYes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients at Risk:

- Diagnosed of primary symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease confirmed with appropriate imaging studies.

- Etiologies will be limited to cervical disc herniation, spinal stenosis, low-grade (I and II) spondylolisthesis, spondylosis and degenerative disc disease.

- Will be undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, not to exceed 5 levels.

- Presence of both axial (neck pain) and appendicular (arm pain/dysesthesia/weakness) symptoms, regardless of proportion

- Subject must be able to be contacted by telephone during study participation

- NDI > 20%

- Read and comprehend English

Inclusion Criteria for patients with zero risk:

- Diagnosed of primary symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease confirmed with appropriate imaging studies.

- Etiologies will be limited to cervical disc herniation, spinal stenosis, low-grade (I and II) spondylolisthesis, spondylosis and degenerative disc disease.

- Will be undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, not to exceed 5 levels.

- Presence of both axial (neck pain) and appendicular (arm pain/dysesthesia/weakness) symptoms, regardless of proportion

- Subject must be able to be contacted by telephone during study participation

- NDI > 20%

- Read and comprehend English

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria for patients at risk:

- Contraindicated to surgical treatment of the cervical spine.

- Prior cervical fusion

- Evidence of severe cervical spinal deformity based on Ames classification: C2-C7 SVA > 8cm, Horizontal Gaze < -10 or > 25, T1S-CL > 20, myelopathy (JOA score <10) or severe adult spinal deformity based on SRS-Schwab classification (PI-LL > 20, PT >30, SVA > 90 mm)

- Undergoing simultaneous treatment for thoracolumbar spine related diagnoses at the time of enrollment History of any spinal surgery within the last 6 months

- Patients with neck pain attributable to trauma, idiopathic deformity, neoplasm, osteoporosis, or other medical condition.

- Unlikely to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule

- Subject has recent history of chemical substance dependency that may impact the outcome or study participation

Exclusion Criteria for patients with zero risk:

- Contraindicated to surgical treatment of the cervical spine.

- Prior cervical fusion

- Evidence of severe cervical spinal deformity based on Ames classification: C2-C7 SVA > 8cm, Horizontal Gaze < -10 or > 25, T1S-CL > 20, myelopathy (JOA score <10) or severe adult spinal deformity based on SRS-Schwab classification (PI-LL > 20, PT >30, SVA > 90 mm)

- Undergoing simultaneous treatment for thoracolumbar spine related diagnoses at the time of enrollment History of any spinal surgery within the last 6 months

- Patients with neck pain attributable to trauma, idiopathic deformity, neoplasm, osteoporosis, or other medical condition.

- Unlikely to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule

- Subject has recent history of chemical substance dependency that may impact the outcome or study participation

- Subject has a significant psychosocial disturbance or psychiatric history that may impact the outcome or study participation including a DRAM score over 33

- Active infection

- Systemic infection (AIDS, HIV, or active hepatitis)

- Active litigation

- Presence of inflammatory spinal disease (e.g. chronic autoimmune conditions, ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, Rheumatoid Arthritis)

- Concurrent Spinal or pelvic fracture

Outcome

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) [2 Years]

The DRAM assesses and profiles patients: those showing no psychological distress, those at risk of developing major psychological overlay, and those that are distressed.

2. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) [2 Years]

The pain catastrophizing scale quantifies an individual's pain experience, their tendency to magnify the threat value of pain, and their ability to prevent pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event.

3. Outcome Expectation question (OEQ) [2 Years]

The OEQ will be a single item question: "I strongly believe that I will recover quickly from my surgery. Responses are score on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Outcome expectations have been shown to be one of the strongest psychological predictors affecting recovery from musculoskeletal injuries.

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge