English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Zhonghua zheng xing shao shang wai ke za zhi = Zhonghua zheng xing shao shang waikf [i.e. waike] zazhi = Chinese journal of plastic surgery and burns 1991-Jun

[Common pathogens in burn infection and changes in their drug sensitivity].

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
Y P Zhang

Keywords

Abstract

This paper reports common pathogens in burn infection and changes in their drug sensitivity from 1985 to 1988. Gram negative rods constituted 55.7% of all pathogens, while 40.5% were gram positive cocci. The former group consisted of 173 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.5%), 55 Proteus (9.1%), 33 Serratia (5.4%), 23 Klebsiella (3.8%) 19, Acinetobacter (3.1%), 18 Enterobacter (3.0%) and 17 E. coli (2.8%). Among gram-positive cocci, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 32.8%, Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for 5.6%, and Streptococcus faecalis accounted for 2.1%. All the gram-negative rods and gram-positive cocci showed more resistance against various antibiotics. Ps. aeruginosa were resistant to 24 commonly used antibiotics. However, ciprofloxacin, ceftaztdime and piperacillin were comparatively effective, the sensitivity rates were 92.9%, 91.5% and 78.3%, respectively. Ps. aeruginosa showed a sensitivity rate of 92.5% and 86.1% to amikacin and polymyxin-B, respectively, from 1980 to 1984, but the rates were lowered to 65.9% and 17.3%, respectively, from 1985 to 1988. Staphylococcus aureus showed a sensitivity rate of 88.9% to ciprofloxacin, 76.1% to ceftazidime, 71.4% to amikacin, 48.5% to piperacillin, 63.1% to cefuroxime. This organism showed a sensitivity rate of 87.3%, 83.9%, 81.7% and 82.8% to amikacin, cefoperozone, leucomycin and lincomycin, respectively, from 1980 to 1984, but the sensitivity rates declined to 71.4%, 56.8%, 60.8% and 43.7%, respectively, from 1985 to 1988.

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge