Improving Skin Cancer Management With Artificial Intelligence (04.17 SMARTI)
Palabras clave
Abstracto
Descripción
This is a pilot study which aims to establish whether artificial intelligence can be used as a diagnostic aid to improve diagnostic accuracy and outcomes in the specialist setting prior to conducting a much larger trial of the intervention in primary care.
Objectives:
1. To establish whether the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence system is on par with teledermatologists' clinical assessment.
2. To establish the safety and feasibility of offering artificial intelligence as a diagnostic aid prior to conducting a large trial of the intervention in primary care.
Hypotheses:
1. The AI algorithm will have diagnostic accuracy comparable with a teledermatologists' assessment.
2. The AI algorithm will have a diagnostic accuracy more conservative (i.e. more false positives) than dermatologists in the clinical setting.
3. The AI algorithm will have greater diagnostic accuracy than the registrar.
4. The AI algorithm will lead to a reduction in the number of biopsies performed by the registrar the likely impact of which will be reduced cost to patients and the healthcare system.
Trial Design:
The pilot study will take place in specialist dermatology and melanoma clinics in Victoria, Australia. Potential participants will be identified and screened at the general dermatology and melanoma clinics by the clinic doctors who deem the participant meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Intervention:
Photography of lesions using a MoleMap camera device with automated artificial intelligence providing an assessment of the lesion in real time.
This pilot study will be a before and after intervention trial design. For the initial 'lead-in' phase, no AI diagnosis will be provided back to the treating clinicians. This phase will be used for prospective data collection.
For the intervention phase, an AI diagnosis will be provided to the dermatology registrar (who is used in this pilot study as a surrogate for the GP) and dermatologist after they have both assessed the patient clinically. Management of the lesion will be determined by the dermatologist and recorded.
The safety of the device will be determined by its use in the setting of specialist dermatology clinics to ensure that patients are receiving the highest standard of care with a dermatologist providing a clinical diagnosis and management for all lesions tested.
It is anticipated that the full trial will expand to include multiple sites across Australia and New Zealand.
fechas
| Verificado por última vez: | 08/31/2019 |
| Primero enviado: | 07/28/2019 |
| Inscripción estimada enviada: | 07/28/2019 |
| Publicado por primera vez: | 07/30/2019 |
| Última actualización enviada: | 09/29/2019 |
| Última actualización publicada: | 10/01/2019 |
| Fecha de inicio real del estudio: | 09/30/2019 |
| Fecha estimada de finalización primaria: | 09/30/2020 |
| Fecha estimada de finalización del estudio: | 09/30/2020 |
Condición o enfermedad
Intervención / tratamiento
Device: Active phase
Fase
Grupos de brazos
| Brazo | Intervención / tratamiento |
|---|---|
| No Intervention: Lead-in phase During the lead-in phase treating clinicians will not be given the Molemap artificial intelligence diagnosis in real-time (i.e. in clinic with the patient). | |
| Active Comparator: Active phase During the active phase treating clinicians will be given the Molemap artificial intelligence diagnosis in real-time. | Device: Active phase This device/software incorporates artificial intelligence to provide a diagnostic aide for clinicians of patients with potentially malignant skin lesions. The software is supported by the use of cameras for acquisition of images. |
Criterio de elegibilidad
| Edades elegibles para estudiar | 18 Years A 18 Years |
| Sexos elegibles para estudiar | All |
| Acepta voluntarios saludables | si |
| Criterios | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients attending the specialist dermatology clinics for skin cancer assessment or surveillance. 2. Patients may or may not have a lesion of concern. 3. Patients must have at least two lesions imaged during full skin examination by a dermatologist. 4. Age greater than 18 years. 5. Participant is willing and able to undertake investigation of suspicious lesion (e.g. skin biopsy). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient does not give informed consent. 2. Patient is unable or unwilling to have a full skin examination 3. Patient has a known past or current diagnosis of cognitive impairment |
Salir
Medidas de resultado primarias
1. Diagnostic accuracy of the device when compared prospectively to a teledermatologist assesment [12 months]
Medidas de resultado secundarias
1. Diagnostic accuracy of the device when used prospectively as compared to a dermatologist assessment [12 months]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of the device compared to teledermatologist, dermatologist and registrar using histopathology as 'gold standard' for any lesions biopsied. [12 months]
3. Appropriate selection of lesions by registrar compared to specialist dermatologists [12 months]
4. Appropriateness of management by registrar compared to specialist dermatologists and impact AI might have on this. [12 months]
