The Fitness, Game Bike Adherence, Motivation and Exercise Study
Palabras clave
Abstracto
Descripción
Short title: Fit Game: Fitness & Game Bike Adherence, Motivation and Exercise Study
Study period: 3 years Clinical phase: Phase III trial
Background:
Cancer is a significant economic burden in Canada, through direct costs to the health-care system (e.g., care and rehabilitation related to disease) and indirectly through lost economic output (e.g., missed work due to illness, premature death). At least half of all new cancer cases and deaths worldwide can be prevented, thus it is imperative that primary prevention become a focus of research. Recent research suggests a strong relationship between physical activity and many of the most prevalent forms of cancer including breast, lung, and colon cancer (i.e., the more an individual exercises the less likely they are to develop cancer). Despite these findings, over half of the Canadian population fails to meet levels of physical activity recommended as a preventative measure. Additionally, it has been found that the largest declines in physical activity occur early in life; thus, promotion efforts targeting critical transitions to physical inactivity early in life are paramount. Findings from a Canadian Community Health Survey note that only 21% of Canadian youth are accumulating enough daily activity to meet international guidelines for optimal growth and development. As well, national cross-sectional and cohort studies on physical inactivity/overweight prevalence demonstrate that the most prominent deflection point is between ages 25 to 35, and this has been linked convincingly to the demands of parenthood. Thus, two important target groups for disease prevention are parents and their children through family-based physical activity initiatives. Unfortunately, interventions of this type are limited and have resulted in little changes in physical activity. Previous studies have focused heavily on education about the benefits/barriers of physical activity, followed by a self-monitoring and self-regulatory (e.g., goal-setting) component. One area that has been overlooked when trying to increase physical activity participation among youth, despite its reliable and robust association with physical activity, is the modification of affective expectations or judgements (expected pleasure or enjoyment).
The introduction of new, enjoyable, and engaging exercise activities may present a novel approach to increase physical activity. One group of activities with this potential is interactive exercise video gaming including games such as the Game Bike system, Sony PlayStation EyeToy, and Nintendo Wii. These games allow players to interact physically (using leg, arm, or whole-body movement) in response to some on-screen virtual activity and provide a controlled opportunity for physical activity and exercise in a family environment.
Emerging evidence suggests that these games can significantly increase energy expenditure similar to moderate to vigorous intensity physical activities that can translate into health-related fitness improvements. Our systematic review of existing active video game interventions highlight the potential of this approach to increase physical activity in children and young people. Additionally, our previous research with these games has also demonstrated the health-related fitness gains even when compared to standard cycling conditions.
Despite these positive effects, there is very little information present to understand adherence to exercise videogames (EV). Our own research with university-aged males showed that an intervention group using an interactive Game bike attended 30% more sessions than a control group using traditional stationary exercise bikes. Even fewer studies on EV have evaluated the motivational properties of these games and the potential reasons for this improved adherence over control physical activity conditions. Only two studies have measured psychological constructs to examine effects of EV on motivation. Results of our previous work suggests that EV can effectively change affective judgments about physical activity and subsequent behaviour unlike most prior intervention efforts.
Despite early positive findings, EV research has notable limitations. First, the populations employed in EV research have been limited to convenience samples of male undergraduate students. Research needs to expand to other samples in order to examine the reach of EV. Second, EV research has almost been exclusively conducted in a laboratory setting. While helpful for initial pilot/efficacy phase research, EV research needs to be conducted in ecologically valid locations. The family home seems an excellent test for whether EVs can still affect psychological, behavioural, and fitness outcomes when situated in a naturalistic location with other leisure-time stimuli. Finally, the length of EV trials has been limited to six-week longitudinal tests or single exposure examinations. Trials of longer duration would be very helpful to examine continuing interest in EV and subsequent adherence. It may be that EV provides a powerful novel experience in the short term but wanes similar to other exercise initiatives across time. Our proposed study will overcome these past limitations and advance the current knowledge of EV.
Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of an interactive exercise video bike (i.e., Active Cycle) in comparison to a stationary bike (Active Cycle without the videogame controllers) in front of a TV on physical fitness, use of the bikes, and perceptions of the bikes. We will also explore whether season (winter/summer), age (parents/kids) and gender (males/females) affect the use of the various bikes.
Study population:
The targeted population will be inactive families within the Greater Victoria Area, British Columbia and the Greater Halifax Area, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Number of subjects:
A total of 160 families will be recruited (n=80 per group). 120 families will be recruited at the Greater Victoria site. The remainder will be recruited from Greater Halifax.
Each family in the EV-interactive condition will receive a videogame bike (Hogan Health Industries, West Jordan, Utah) that will be linked into the family's Sony Playstation 2 or 3® (Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc, Foster City, California). If the family does not own a Sony Playstation 2 or 3® it will be provided to them for the duration of the intervention. Families will choose five videogames from a variety of Sony Playstation 2 or 3® videogames. At 3 months, families will be given the opportunity to select five new videogames, if they wish. Each family in the control group will receive a traditional stationary bike (i.e., an Active Cycle without the videogame controllers) which will be placed in front of their television.
Statistical methods:
Study power:
A sample size of 160 families (80 per group) will be recruited to detect a small-medium effect size (f2 = .10) in adherence to physical activity (primary outcome) with a type one error of .05, an average correlation of .75 across time for our dependent variable (DV) of interest, and a power of .80. Our sample size also considers the main 2 (group) x 2 (parent/child) x 4 (time)repeated measures design and a potential 15% attrition rate. The prediction-based research will be examined by group condition as well as via the collapsed sample for mediation analyses. Considering an average of 5 predictor independent variables (Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) or Self-Determination Theory (SDT) models), and using a small-medium effect size (f2 = .10) we will have sufficient power (.80) to evaluate these predictors at an alpha of .05.
Statistical analysis:
Intention to treat analysis will be used to evaluate the main treatment effect. Missing data in the primary outcome measures will be imputed using a pre-specified approach. Research question 1 will be analyzed using a 2 (condition) x 4 (time) repeated measures factorial ANOVA on the primary outcome of child adherence to the bikes. A child (i.e., the target child) from each household in the eligibility range will serve for this analysis (chosen through randomization procedures). Post hoc examinations using Tukey follow-up procedures will be utilized if necessary.
Our secondary objectives (parent; parent/child; gender; season; fitness variables, etc.), will also be analyzed using a variant of this design with the addition of factors. Cluster analysis/Hierarchical Linear Modelling will be used for parent/child collinearity. Our pilot study (r = .21) and prior research suggests limited collinearity but it is appropriate to explore findings with these approaches given these are naturally clustered environments (i.e., family home). Prediction using our models (TPB, SDT) and questions of mediation will be achieved via multiple regression analyses following standard procedures for these types of tests.
The qualitative analyses will incorporate the following processes: 1) Invite participants to review the transcripts of interviews, and summarize their perception of the data, for accuracy, and check for the trustworthiness of the data; 2) Conduct a thematic analysis using a reciprocal coding approach where researchers engage in open dialogue about themes and data interpretation. In doing so, each transcript is first reviewed independently, then through dialogue composite themes and related critical issues are developed; and 3) Manage the data using the NVivo software program. NVivo enables theory building, testing and elaboration. With NVivo, 'free nodes' can be created during the coding process, capturing participants' perspectives and the investigators' critical issues.
fechas
Verificado por última vez: | 11/30/2014 |
Primero enviado: | 05/31/2011 |
Inscripción estimada enviada: | 06/12/2011 |
Publicado por primera vez: | 06/14/2011 |
Última actualización enviada: | 12/10/2014 |
Última actualización publicada: | 12/14/2014 |
Fecha de inicio real del estudio: | 12/31/2010 |
Fecha estimada de finalización primaria: | 04/30/2014 |
Fecha estimada de finalización del estudio: | 04/30/2014 |
Condición o enfermedad
Intervención / tratamiento
Behavioral: Exercise Videogame Bikes
Fase
Grupos de brazos
Brazo | Intervención / tratamiento |
---|---|
Experimental: Exercise Videogame Bike Families in this group will receive an interactive exercise videogame bike (ie. the Active Cycle) to keep in their home for three months. | |
Other: Stationary Bike Families will receive a stationary bike to keep in their home for three months. It is required that the family places the stationary bike (Active Cycle without video game controllers) in front of a television. |
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar | 10 Years A 10 Years |
Sexos elegibles para estudiar | All |
Acepta voluntarios saludables | si |
Criterios | Inclusion Criteria: - Married or common law parents with children between the ages of 10 and 14 - self-report low family physical activity - At least 1 parent is not meeting Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines - Target child is not meeting Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines Exclusion Criteria: - Participant is unsafe to participate in physical activity as determined by answers to the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) |
Salir
Medidas de resultado primarias
1. Children's self-reported adherence [Usage log will be filled in for 3 month duration]
Medidas de resultado secundarias
1. parent's self-reported adherence [Usage log will be filled in for 3 month duration]
2. Change from baseline in motivation at 6 weeks [baseline & 6 weeks]
3. Change in baseline in self-reported physical activity at 6 weeks [baseline & 6 weeks]
4. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life / psychosocial distress at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]
5. Change from baseline in depression and anxiety at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]
6. Change from baseline in physical self-perception at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]
7. Change from baseline in physical home environment at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]
8. Change from baseline in body composition at 3 months. [baseline & 3 months]
9. Change from baseline in cardiovascular fitness at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]
10. Change from baseline in motivation at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]
11. Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity at 3 months [Baseline & 3 months]
12. Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity at 3 months [baseline & 3 months]