Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Side Effects of Mandibular Advancement Devices

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
TilaRekrytointi
Sponsorit
University Medicine Greifswald

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SBAS) are one of the most common causes of non-restorative sleep.
Sleep therapy options include positive pressure ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks, mandibular advancement of the mandible with mandibular advancement devices (MAD), back restraining, weight reduction, ear, nose and throat surgical procedures, bimaxillary or mandibular remodeling osteotomies, and neurostimulation procedures N. hypoglossal. In mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), MAD, back suppression and weight reduction are potential treatment options. This study aims to identify possible side effects in the temporomandibular system that occur during nocturnal support of a mandibular arch over two years. Two different MADs are compared in terms of construction, height (bite elevation) and protrusion mechanics: the H-MAD with an hinge system according to Herbst and the SomnoDent Fusion ™ MAD (called F-MAD) with sliding side wings.
In addition, it is to be evaluated whether hinge system according to Herbst as a protrusion-controlling element and the reduction of the splint body for a reduced bite elevation leads to a significant reduction of side effects compared to the F-MAD.

Kuvaus

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SBAS), particularly obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), are one of the most common causes of non-restorative sleep. Disturbances of sleep disorders include apneas and hypopneas associated with either or not pharyngeal obstruction and hypoventilation. Depending on the type of respiratory disorder present, they are associated with hypoxemia and may cause hypercapnia or acidosis The consequences of obstructive narrowing of the pharynx are far-reaching. Studies have shown that patients with OSAS have comorbidities such as neurological complaints, heart attacks, dementia, cardiovascular complaints, myocardial infarction, and a higher mortality rate.

Sleep fragmentation caused by respiratory disorders during sleep and wakefulness reactions (arousals) can lead to daytime sleepiness and concentration disorders. In the longer term untreated arousals and apneas are associated with an increased risk for arterial hypertension, stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus and libido loss.

OSAS management includes positive pressure ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks, mandibular advancement of the mandible with mandibular advancement devices (MAD), weight loss, ear, nose and throat surgical procedures, bimaxillary or mandibular remodeling osteotomies, and neurostimulation procedures of the hypoglossal nerve.

Several studies have shown that the use of MADs is inferior in reducing the severity of OSAS in comparison to CPAP therapy, but its efficacy is comparable and preferred by patients in mild to moderate OSAS.

Due to the forward displacement of the lower jaw for several hours at night, similar symptoms as in temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) patients may occur. The symptoms may be pain or stiffness on the masticatory muscles or temporomandibular joints.

This study aims to identify possible side effects in the temporomandibular system that occur during the course of two years of nocturnal MAD delivery. Two different appliance systems are compared in terms of construction height (bite elevation) and protrusion mechanics: the H-MAD ™ with a hinge system according to Herbst and the SomnoDent Fusion ™ (called F-MAD) with sliding side wings.

Päivämäärät

Viimeksi vahvistettu: 05/31/2020
Ensimmäinen lähetys: 07/31/2019
Arvioitu ilmoittautuminen lähetetty: 08/05/2019
Ensimmäinen lähetetty: 08/07/2019
Viimeisin päivitys lähetetty: 06/14/2020
Viimeisin päivitys lähetetty: 06/15/2020
Todellinen opintojen alkamispäivä: 11/30/2019
Arvioitu ensisijainen valmistumispäivä: 11/30/2022
Arvioitu tutkimuksen valmistumispäivä: 12/20/2022

Ehto tai tauti

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Temporomandibular Disorders

Interventio / hoito

Device: H-MAD with a hinge system according to Herbst

Vaihe

-

Varren ryhmät

VarsiInterventio / hoito
Experimental: H-MAD, hinge system according to Herbst
Patients with snoring and OSAS. Therapy with MAD type H-MAD with lateral hinges according to Herbst. Bite elevation 2 mm interocclusal distance with a lower jaw advancement of 5 mm
Active Comparator: F-MAD, SomnoDent Fusion
Patients with snoring and OSAS,Fusion MAD with sliding side wings (F-MAD). Bite elevation 5 mm interocclusal distance with a lower jaw advancement of 5 mm

Kelpoisuusehdot

Tutkimukseen soveltuvat iät 18 Years Vastaanottaja 18 Years
Sukupuolet, jotka ovat kelpoisia tutkimukseenAll
Hyväksyy terveelliset vapaaehtoisetJoo
Kriteeri

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with medical indication for mandibular protrusion (MAD) due to OSAS

- therapy request for snoring

- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35

- mandibular protrusion of 5 mm possible

- at least 8 remaining teeth or 4 implants per jaw

- fixed dentures and stable

- removable partial denture, at least support up to the area of the 2nd premolars on both sides

- business ability and the existence of the signed declaration of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- polyarthritis

- fibromyalgia, neuralgia

- central sleep apnea syndrome

- untreated generalized periodontitis

- chronic dysfunctional pain degree 3-4

- long-term use of psychotropics and analgesics (> 4 weeks)

- pregnancy

- participation in another interventional clinical study (currently up to three months before inclusion)

Tulokset

Ensisijaiset tulosmittaukset

1. change orofacial pain: numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

change of orofacial pain after applying the MAD measured by numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10, 0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)

Toissijaiset tulosmittaukset

1. pressure pain points on palpation [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

number of pressure pain points on palpation of the masticatory muscles and in the area of the temporomandibular joints according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD)

2. number of posterior contact points [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

change of the number of occluding posterior teeth

Muut lopputulokset

1. change in sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, 0-21, < 5: good sleep) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

change in sleep quality after applying the MAD measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index retrospectively asks for a four-week period the incidence of sleep disturbing events, sleep quality assessment, sleep habits, sleep latency and sleep duration, sleeping medication use.

2. change in daytime sleepiness: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS, 0-24, <11 no daytime sleepiness) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

Change in daytime sleepiness measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale. ESS is a short questionnaire for the detection of daytime sleepiness. (ESS, 0-24, <11 no daytime sleepiness)

3. change in oral health-related quality of life: Oral Health Impact profile (OHIP-5) (0-20) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

Oral Health Impact profile (OHIP-5) is a measurement tool for assessing the oral health-related quality of life in adults. It consists of 5 questions for functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, social disability

4. change in chronic pain: Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) questionnaire (0-4) [4 weeks, six months, one year, two years]

Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) questionnaire records pain intensity and the presence of functional or dysfunctional chronic pain. Three subscale scores (characteristic pain intensity, disability score, and the disability points score) are used to classify subjects into 1 of the 5 pain severity grades: grade 0 for no pain, grade 1displays low disability, low intensity, grade 2 displays low disability but high intensity, grade 3 displays high disability,moderately limiting and grade 4 displays high disability and severely limiting.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge