Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Progress in Brain Research 2007

Cerebral pathophysiology and clinical neurology of hyperthermia in humans.

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
Olaf L Cremer
Cor J Kalkman

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

Deliberate hyperthermia has been used clinically as experimental therapy for neoplastic and infectious diseases. Several case fatalities have occurred with this form of treatment, but most were attributable to systemic complications rather than central nervous system toxicity. Nonetheless, demyelating peripheral neuropathy and neurological symptoms of nausea, delirium, apathy, stupor, and coma have been reported. Temperatures exceeding 40 degrees C cause transient vasoparalysis in humans, resulting in cerebral metabolic uncoupling and loss of pressure-flow autoregulation. These findings may be related to the development of brain edema, intracerebral hemorrhage, and intracranial hypertension observed after prolonged therapeutic hyperthermia. Furthermore, deliberate hyperthermia critically worsens the extent of histopathological damage in animal models of traumatic, ischemic, and hypoxic brain injury. However, it is unknown whether these findings translate to episodes of spontaneous fever in neurologically injured patients. In a clinical setting fever is a strong prognostic marker of a patient's primary degree of neuronal damage, and a causal relation with long-term functional neurological outcome has not been established for most types of brain injury. Furthermore, in the neurosurgical intensive-care unit fever is extremely common whereas antipyretic therapy is only poorly effective. Therefore maintaining strict normothermia may be an impossible goal in many patients. Although there are several physiological arguments for avoiding exogenous hyperthermia in neurologically injured patients, there is no evidence that aggressive attempts at controlling spontaneous fever can improve clinical outcome.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge