Français
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Milrinone Versus Dobutamine in Critically Ill Patients

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent traduire des articles
Se connecter S'inscrire
Le lien est enregistré dans le presse-papiers
StatutTerminé
Les sponsors
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Mots clés

Abstrait

The investigators are interested in determining if there is a meaningful difference between two of the most commonly used medications used to improve the pumping function of the heart among critically ill patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI). To do this, the investigators will randomly assign patients who are felt to require use of these medications by their treating physicians to one of the two most commonly used agents in Canada: Milrinone or Dobutamine. Each patient will be closely monitored by their healthcare team, and their medication will be adjusted based on each patient's clinical status. Information from blood work (e.g. kidney and liver function, complete blood counts, and other markers of how effectively blood is circulating in the body), assessment of end-organ function (e.g. urine output, mentation), abnormal heart rhythms noted on monitoring and results of imaging studies (e.g. angiogram, echocardiograms.) will be collected for analysis. All patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay at UOHI.

La description

The use of various inotropes in the care of critically ill cardiac patients has become increasingly widespread: while predominantly used in decompensated heart failure, they have also been used in cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and septic shock. Purported mechanisms of efficacy include improved cardiac output, improved end-organ perfusion, and vasodilation of both pulmonary and systemic circulations. Two of the most commonly used agents are Milrinone, a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, and Dobutamine, a synthetic catecholamine with affinity for both beta-1 and 2 receptors. Both the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) support inotropes for acute and chronic heart failure management with low cardiac output states. Furthermore, the ACC recommends consideration of inotropic therapy within the STEMI guidelines when ACS is complicated by cardiogenic shock, heart failure or for hemodynamic support in isolated right ventricle infarctions. Beyond primarily cardiac etiologies, inotropes have been identified as first-line additive therapy for cardiac augmentation to Norepinephrine in patients with septic shock complicated by myocardial dysfunction. Despite the lack of convincing data supporting a morbidity or mortality benefit with the use of inotropes in severe, decompensated heart failure, cardiogenic or septic shock, or in ACS, inotropic therapy is still widely used across various critical care settings. Furthermore, to date, there has been no head to head comparison of the two more commonly used positive inotropes: Dobutamine and Milrinone. Selection of one inotrope over another is often guided by physician and center preference, and consideration of and purported avoidance of possible adverse effects. In this pilot study, the investigators aim to describe that characteristics of patients receiving inotropic support in the CCU setting and identify possible differences in morbidity and mortality between Dobutamine and Milrinone among a heterogeneous population of patients admitted to the CCU at UOHI, which may help to inform a larger clinical trial in the future.

The purpose of this pilot study is to: (a) describe the characteristics of patients receiving inotropic support in the coronary care unit (CCU) setting (hemodynamics prior to inotrope initiation, etiology of cardiogenic shock state, use of PA catheter and values if deemed necessary by medical team) and (b) identify possible differences in morbidity [atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, hepatic and renal function, markers of end-organ perfusion (lactate, urine output, mentation status), use of vasopressors, sustained hypotension of systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mmHg for greater than 30 minutes, need for mechanical support, cardiac transplant, total length of CCU stay, length of CCU stay greater than 14 days] and mortality between patients in cardiogenic shock treated with Dobutamine versus Milrinone.

Rendez-vous

Dernière vérification: 05/31/2020
Première soumission: 06/26/2017
Inscription estimée soumise: 06/29/2017
Première publication: 07/01/2017
Dernière mise à jour soumise: 06/28/2020
Dernière mise à jour publiée: 06/29/2020
Date de début réelle de l'étude: 08/29/2017
Date d'achèvement primaire estimée: 06/11/2020
Date estimée d'achèvement de l'étude: 06/11/2020

Condition ou maladie

Low Cardiac Output Syndrome
Cardiogenic Shock
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Pulmonary Edema

Intervention / traitement

Drug: Milrinone

Drug: Dobutamine

Phase

Phase 4

Groupes d'armes

BrasIntervention / traitement
Active Comparator: Left ventricular [LV] +/- Biventricular dysfunction
Assessment of left ventricular [LV] or biventricular dysfunction will be based on clinical assessment, available imaging (echocardiogram, left ventriculogram, MUGA/RNA scan, cardiac MRI, etc.) and known past medical history (if available and contributory). Patients identified as having biventricular dysfunction will be randomized within the LV dysfunction arm of the trial. Patients in this arm will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to Milrinone or Dobutamine.
Active Comparator: Right ventricular [RV] dysfunction
Assessment of right ventricular [RV] dysfunction will be based on clinical assessment, available imaging (echocardiogram, left ventriculogram, MUGA/RNA scan, cardiac MRI, etc.) and known past medical history (if available and contributory). Patients in this arm will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to Milrinone or Dobutamine.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles aux études 18 Years À 18 Years
Sexes éligibles à l'étudeAll
Accepte les bénévoles en santéOui
Critères

Inclusion Criteria:

- Have one or more of the following:

- Low cardiac output state, evidenced by sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) and end organ dysfunction (altered level of consciousness, elevated lactate, renal or hepatic dysfunction)

- Clinical evidence of systemic and/or pulmonary congestion despite use of vasodilators and/or diuretics

- ACS complicated by cardiogenic shock (defined as persistent hypotension with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg with severe reduction in cardiac index [<1.8 L/min/m2 without support or <2.2 L/min/m2 with support], left ventricular end-diastolic pressure >18 mmHg)

- Augmentation of cardiac output when patient already on maximal vasopressor therapy

- Or medical team's decision that patient needs inotropic therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

- Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent by the patient or substitute decision maker for healthcare decisions

- Female participants who are currently pregnant

- Patients presenting with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA)

- Healthcare team preference for use of specific inotrope (Milrinone or Dobutamine)

Résultat

Mesures des résultats primaires

1. Composite Primary End Point [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Composite of all-cause in-hospital death, non-fatal MI, TIA or CVA diagnosed by a Neurologist, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, need for cardiac transplant or new mechanical support, any atrial or ventricular arrhythmia leading to cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

2. All-cause in-hospital death [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

All-cause in-hospital death

3. Non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI] [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

As defined by Thygesen et al., 2012 (Circulation)

4. Transient ischemic attack [TIA] or cerebrovascular accident [CVA] [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident as diagnosed by a Neurologist either clinically and/or radiographically

5. Stay in CCU greater than or equal to 7 days [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Stay in CCU greater than or equal to 7 days

6. Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (intermittent hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy)

7. Need for advanced mechanical support [specifically, intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, ventricular assist device or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation] or cardiac transplant [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Need for new mechanical support or cardiac transplant

Mesures des résultats secondaires

1. Time on inotropes [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Total time on inotropes (in hours)

2. Non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Total number of days requiring non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation

3. Change in cardiac index ([CI] [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Change in cardiac index measured with PA catheter

4. Change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measured with PA catheter

5. Change in pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Change in pulmonary vascular resistance measured with PA catheter

6. Change in systemic vascular resistance [SVR] [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Change in systemic vascular resistance measured with PA catheter

7. Presence of acute kidney injury [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Presence of acute kidney injury (defined by KDIGO as creatinine increased by 26.5 umol/L, 1.5 times baseline within prior 7 days, or urine volume <0.5 mL/kg/hour for greater than or equal to 6 hours

8. Serum lactate [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Normalization of serum lactate

9. Arrhythmia requiring medical team intervention [Through duration of hospitalization, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Arrhythmia requiring medical team intervention, either through electrical or chemical cardioversion or any intravenous anti-arrhythmia medication administration

Autres mesures des résultats

1. Sustained hypotension of systolic BP [Through duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Sustained systolic blood pressure hypotension of less than or equal to 90 mmHg for greater than or equal to 30 minutes (or requiring medical intervention)

2. Atrial arrhythmias requiring medical intervention [Through duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Atrial flutter, fibrillation or tachycardia requiring medical intervention

3. Need for intravenous or oral anti-arrhythmic therapy [Through duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Initiation of intravenous or oral anti-arrhythmic therapy

4. Ventricular arrhythmias [Through duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Ventricular arrhythmias (monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia [VT] greater than 30 seconds or hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmia requiring intervention, or VF)

5. Need for up-titration or addition of new vasopressor therapy [Through duration of hospitalization in CCU, up to 12 weeks following admission]

Need for up-titration or addition of new vasopressor therapy

Rejoignez notre
page facebook

La base de données d'herbes médicinales la plus complète soutenue par la science

  • Fonctionne en 55 langues
  • Cures à base de plantes soutenues par la science
  • Reconnaissance des herbes par image
  • Carte GPS interactive - étiquetez les herbes sur place (à venir)
  • Lisez les publications scientifiques liées à votre recherche
  • Rechercher les herbes médicinales par leurs effets
  • Organisez vos intérêts et restez à jour avec les nouvelles recherches, essais cliniques et brevets

Tapez un symptôme ou une maladie et lisez des informations sur les herbes qui pourraient aider, tapez une herbe et voyez les maladies et symptômes contre lesquels elle est utilisée.
* Toutes les informations sont basées sur des recherches scientifiques publiées

Google Play badgeApp Store badge