Icelandic
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ 2006-Jan

Study of oral itraconazole and terbinafine pulse therapy in onychomycosis.

Aðeins skráðir notendur geta þýtt greinar
Skráðu þig / skráðu þig
Krækjan er vistuð á klemmuspjaldið
A U Sikder
S A Mamun
A H Chowdhury
R M Khan
M M Hoque

Lykilorð

Útdráttur

In this open, randomized and comparative study, the safety and efficacy of systemic intermittent itraconazole and terbinafine was examined in 30 patients with onychomycosis. The patient with positive mycological culture and also the patients with positive microscopy and negative culture were investigated. Patients were randomly assigned: 15 patients in each group received either 200mg itraconazole or 250 mg terbinafine twice daily during the first week of a 4 weeks cycle. The treatment duration was 16 weeks and was followed-up for 36 weeks. Both the treatment regimen showed significant reduction in onychomycosis affected areas after 8 weeks and maximum reduction was observed at the end of 36 weeks. At the end point of the follow-up period, the clinical cure rates (no residual deformity or with some deformity) were 86.7% in the itraconazole group and 100% in the terbinafine group. The mycological cure rates were 86.7% and 100% respectively. However, no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were seen in clinical, mycological (P= 0.864) and severity assessment (P= 0.220). Nausea, abdominal cramp, headache, back pain and flu like syndrome are the adverse effects more frequently reported. At least one adverse effect was reported by 17 patients, of them 12 belonged to itraconazole group and 5 to terbinafine group and the difference was statistically significant (P= 0.027). The overall therapeutic effectiveness, safety and cost affectivity were in favor of Terbinafine pulse therapy.

Skráðu þig á
facebook síðu okkar

Heillasta gagnagrunnur lækningajurtanna sem studdur er af vísindum

  • Virkar á 55 tungumálum
  • Jurtalækningar studdir af vísindum
  • Jurtaviðurkenning eftir ímynd
  • Gagnvirkt GPS kort - merktu jurtir á staðsetningu (kemur fljótlega)
  • Lestu vísindarit sem tengjast leit þinni
  • Leitaðu að lækningajurtum eftir áhrifum þeirra
  • Skipuleggðu áhugamál þitt og vertu vakandi með fréttarannsóknum, klínískum rannsóknum og einkaleyfum

Sláðu inn einkenni eða sjúkdóm og lestu um jurtir sem gætu hjálpað, sláðu jurt og sjáðu sjúkdóma og einkenni sem hún er notuð við.
* Allar upplýsingar eru byggðar á birtum vísindarannsóknum

Google Play badgeApp Store badge