Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab for Diabetic Retinopathy

登録ユーザーのみが記事を翻訳できます

ログインサインアップ

リンクがクリップボードに保存されます

状態完了

スポンサー

Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, M.D.

臨床試験: NCT00545870

BioSeek: nct00545870

キーワード

概要

Treatment of diabetic macular edema with perifoveal focal/grid laser coagulation was found to be effective saving the visual acuity only in 50% of patients and only 3-14% of treated patients had an improved visual acuity postoperatively. The decent results of lasercoagulation are associated with potential side effects, as focal scotomas, change of color discrimination and development of epiretinal gliosis. The frequency of perifoveal laser treatments is anatomically limited in case of diabetic macular edema: after application of about 350 coagulates there is no possibility to repeat the laser treatment perifoveolar without creating confluent lasercoagulates and causing significant scotomas. In case of persistence of edema in spite of complete perifoveal grid coagulation, no standard therapy exists. Some previous studies investigated the effect of steroids in patients with diabetic macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation, but the benefit on the visual acuity was only temporary and the intravitreal application was associated with significant side effects as cataract progression (up to 50%) and ocular hypertension (up to 20%).

In the Diabetic Retinopathy Study the 4-years rate for severe vision loss in patients with high-risk retinopathy was 20.4 %. In cases of proliferative retinopathy, panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation can reduce the risk for development of high-risk retinopathy by 50% over 6 years. When panretinal lasercoagulation is initiated, about 2000 laser spots are equally distributed in all four quadrants. Since panretinal photocoagulation bares risks like loss of field of vision, central vision reduction and loss of colour vision, this treatment can not be continued unlimited.

In cases of persisting neovascularisations in spite of panretinal photocoagulation, no evidence based therapy exists. There is a high risk for intravitreal bleeding, rubeosis, secondary glaucoma with severe vision loss. When fibrovascular proliferation leads to retinal detachment, vitreo-retinal surgery might be indicated.

Now we know that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the major angiogenic stimulus responsible for increase of vasopermeability, cellproliferation and angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy (DRP). Several studies, evaluating VEGF levels in vitreous, have indicated a role for VEGF in diabetic macular edema: vitreous samples of patients with diabetic macular edema contain elevated VEGF concentration and VEGF injected in experimental studies results in breakdown of the blood-retina barrier.

There is increasing evidence for a therapeutic role of anti-VEGF drugs not only in age-related macular degeneration but also in other diseases as in diabetic macular edema. Intravitreal injections have become the most favored treatment procedure for administering anti-VEGF drugs.

The side effects and the decent results of laser treatment on the visual acuity in diabetic macular edema led to studies using anti-VEGF therapy. Unpublished study results on the aptamer pegaptanib (Macugen™) are promising. A study using the antibody fragment Ranibizumab (Lucentis™) in patiens with diabetic macula edema is in progress. Ranibizumab is now approved to be used as an intravitreal injection.

Currently there is one additional anti-VEGF drug already on the market: Bevacizumab (Avastin™), which has approved as intravenous infusion for the treatment of metastatic colo-rectal cancer. Previous studies have shown that systemic use of Bevacizumab (Avastin™) can obtain very promising results on patients with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) by age-related macular degenetration. This drug, a monoclonal full-length antibody, designed to bind all isoforms of VEGF is a large molecule. But case reports in patients with CNV caused by age-related macular degeneration and with macular edema from central retinal vein occlusion indicate that intravitreally given Bevacizumab (Avastin™) is effective in diseases originating from the choroids and the retina, too. These findings imply a sufficient penetration of the retina by Bevacizumab (Avastin™).

Based on these new findings and the important role of VEGF in diabetic retinopathy, we propose a pilot study for treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema or persisting active neovascularistaions following lasercoagulation with intravitreally administered Bevacizumab (Avastin™) or Ranibizumab (Lucentis™).

日付

最終確認済み:	03/31/2015
最初に提出された:	10/15/2007
提出された推定登録数:	10/15/2007
最初の投稿:	10/16/2007
最終更新が送信されました:	04/13/2015
最終更新日:	04/14/2015
実際の研究開始日:	05/31/2008
一次完了予定日:	02/28/2013
研究完了予定日:	03/31/2013

状態または病気

Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic Macular Edema

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

介入/治療

Drug: A

Drug: B

段階

段階 3

アームグループ

腕	介入/治療
Experimental: A Bevacizumab treatment	Drug: A intravitreal application
Active Comparator: B Ranibizumab treatment	Drug: B intravitreal application

適格基準

研究の対象となる年齢	18 Years に 18 Years
研究に適格な性別	All
健康なボランティアを受け入れる	はい
基準	Inclusion Criteria: - Age ≥18 years - Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus - HbA1C between 6% and 9 %. - Patients with persistent diabetic macular edema with center involvement following completed grid lasercoagulation in the study eye - Patients with persistent active neovascularisations following completed panretinal lasercoagulation (at least 2000 spots) in the study eye - Last perifoveolar laser treatment 3 months before study entry - Central macular thickness (macular edema) of at least 300 - 550 microns in the central subfield as measured by OCT - Not eligible for any currently approved treatments or experimental protocols - Best corrected visual acuity, using ETDRS charts, of 20/25 to 20/200 (Snellen equivalent) in the study eye - Patients with decrease in vision in the study eye due to foveal thickening from diabetic macular edema and not to other causes, in the opinion of the investigator Exclusion Criteria: - A condition that would preclude a patient for participation in the study in opinion of investigator, e.g., unstable medical status including glycemic control and blood pressure - History of systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 3 times per week - Panretinal laser photocoagulation within the past 3 months or macular laser photocoagulation within the past 3 months in the study eye - Previous treatment with intravitreal or sub-Tenon triamcinolone within the past 3 months in the study eye - Previous participation in clinical trial involving anti-angiogenic drugs (pegabtanib sodium, ranibizumab, anecortave acetate, protein kinase C inhibitor, etc.) - History of submacular surgery or other surgical intervention for diabetic macular edema except grid lasercoagulation in the study eye - Previous participation in any studies of investigational drugs within 1 month preceding Day 0 (excluding vitamins and minerals)

結果

主な結果の測定

1. To investigate the change in macular edema and the absolute change in visual acuity. To investigate the change of neovascularisation. [12 Months]

Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab for Diabetic Retinopathy

キーワード

悪性腫瘍

神経膠症

hemorrhage

edema

atrophy

糖尿病網膜症

加齢黄斑変性

網膜中心静脈閉塞症

scotoma

白内障

緑内障

高眼圧症

抗真菌薬

概要

日付

状態または病気

介入/治療

段階

アームグループ

適格基準

結果

科学に裏打ちされた最も完全な薬草データベース