Japanese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Use of Tragus Pressure in Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia

登録ユーザーのみが記事を翻訳できます
ログインサインアップ
リンクがクリップボードに保存されます
状態募集
スポンサー
National University Hospital, Singapore

キーワード

概要

The aims of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of tragus pressure application in predicting or facilitating recovery from general anaesthesia, and compare the reliability of tragus pressure guided recovery/ emergence from anaesthesia to conventional modes of recovery

説明

More than 70% of general anaesthesia are now performed with laryngeal mask (LMA) as the airway support device with state of the art intra-operative monitoring such as end tidal inhalational anaesthetic agent concentration and fronto-temporal electroencephalographic waves analysis such as the Bispectral index score (BIS) and entropy. The use of LMAs have promised rapid turnover allowing more patients to be operated in the limited operating theatres' time. This comes with the additional price of losing the continuity of advanced monitoring devices in the post anaesthesia units, the best being end tidal carbon dioxide analysis. When patients are brought to the PACU, much of the monitoring of emergence from anaesthesia is fairly done through clinical measures such as motor activity, response to auditory stimuli, tactile taps on shoulder and occasional nociceptive stimuli such as sternal rub. The timing of the responsiveness of these stimuli is unknown and nursing support teams are unable to suggest a frame of time on when the patient would recover. One of the main reasons for this unpredictability is that the recovery is not planned based on the last recorded end tidal anaesthetic agent concentration before leaving the operating theatre to be shifted to PACU, but by an approximation of time since the patient has arrived in PACU and by early signs of recovery such as appearance of forehead wrinkles or motor activities. The incidence of airway events such as laryngospasm, obstruction after removal of airway devices, desaturations from resedation/ apnea and rescue measures such as reintubation/ ambu ventilation needed globally and from our local data is up to 1-5%. The incidence is higher with children and patients with reactive airways, obesity and associated complicating comorbidities. Using BIS monitoring and end tidal agent analysis for each of the 18 post anaesthesia care unit bays for recovering patients scientifically is not a cost-effective initiative. The tragus pressure technique has been known to be appropriate stimuli that has adequate stimulation of reticular activating system (RAS) without producing nociception that can trigger airway events such a laryngospasm. Physiological sleep studies have quoted that tragus pressure can contribute to arousal without causing vagotonic response that is known to occur from 'startle response' or sudden emergence. Through this study we propose to evaluate the consistency in predictability of recovery from general anaesthesia and deep sedation with Ramsay score 3 through application of tragus pressure. The presence of reflex pupillary dilatation and early signs of recovery such as swallowing, gentle grimace and minor peripheral motor movements, we propose, gives a predictable plane of recovery from anaesthesia where the LMAs are removed safely without treading the dreaded stage 2 of excitability of anaesthesia. The proposed method also allows for continued responsiveness of patient with coherent verbal responses to auditory stimuli after safe removal of the airway, thereby minimizing the incidence of airway complication and hence the interventions required for the same. The continued alert responsiveness of the patient also allows for the post anaesthesia unit team to attend to other patients who might need more immediate care.

日付

最終確認済み: 10/31/2019
最初に提出された: 03/25/2020
提出された推定登録数: 03/30/2020
最初の投稿: 04/01/2020
最終更新が送信されました: 03/30/2020
最終更新日: 04/01/2020
実際の研究開始日: 06/30/2017
一次完了予定日: 12/30/2020
研究完了予定日: 12/30/2020

状態または病気

Anesthesia

介入/治療

Procedure: Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia With Tragus Pressure

Procedure: Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia Without Tragus Pressure

段階

-

アームグループ

介入/治療
Other: Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia Without Tragus Pressure
Monitoring of patients and removal of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as per routine practice in post anaesthesia care unit (PACU)
Procedure: Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia Without Tragus Pressure
Usual clinical routine practice in guiding patients from emergence from anaesthesia post-surgery
Experimental: Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia With Tragus Pressure
Tragus pressure documentation of planes of emergence from anaesthesia - regular 3-5 minutes follow up with Tragus pressure till removal of airway device or rejection of it by patient
Procedure: Guiding Emergence From Anaesthesia With Tragus Pressure
Use of tragus pressure in guiding patients from emergence from anaesthesia post-surgery

適格基準

研究の対象となる年齢 21 Years に 21 Years
研究に適格な性別All
健康なボランティアを受け入れるはい
基準

Inclusion Criteria:

- ASA 1 and 2

- Surgeries with no risk of aspiration

- Patients with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insitu on arrival in the PACU

- Surgery duration < 4 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

- ASA 3 and 4

- Organ failure with decompensation : Eg Heart failure, renal failure, liver failure

- History of psychiatric illness or medications for mood control

- Pregnancy

- Patients for neurosurgery or GCS <12/15

- LMA used for failed intubation or difficult airway protocol

- Patients with no LMA on arrival in the PACU

- Patients who are awake with LMA/ Responding to call on arrival at PACU

結果

主な結果の測定

1. Differences in time and ease of LMA removal between study and control group [Postoperatively in PACU from a minimum of 30 minutes till safe recovery from anaesthesia (approximately 1 hour)]

To compare the reliability of tragus pressure guided emergence from anaesthesia to conventional modes of recovery, studied by the timing and ease of removal of LMA.

Facebookページに参加する

科学に裏打ちされた最も完全な薬草データベース

  • 55の言語で動作します
  • 科学に裏打ちされたハーブ療法
  • 画像によるハーブの認識
  • インタラクティブGPSマップ-場所にハーブをタグ付け(近日公開)
  • 検索に関連する科学出版物を読む
  • それらの効果によって薬草を検索する
  • あなたの興味を整理し、ニュース研究、臨床試験、特許について最新情報を入手してください

症状や病気を入力し、役立つ可能性のあるハーブについて読み、ハーブを入力して、それが使用されている病気や症状を確認します。
*すべての情報は公開された科学的研究に基づいています

Google Play badgeApp Store badge