Japanese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Minerva Cardioangiologica 2002-Oct

[Drug-eluting stents do they make the difference? ].

登録ユーザーのみが記事を翻訳できます
ログインサインアップ
リンクがクリップボードに保存されます
P Presbitero
M Asioli

キーワード

概要

The main limitation to further expansion of PTCI (percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention) is restenosis that occurs in 30% of the patients within 6-months after the procedure. Coronary stenting decreases the percent of restenosis due to arterial remodeling after PTCI but proliferation of smooth muscle cells due to vascular injury still remains. A mechanical approach the only treatment up to now (further balloon expansion, plaque removal with rotablator or directional atherectomy) failed. Because the restenotic process is due to a complex series of biological events which start with platelet aggregation, grow-factors and cytochine release, the use of antiflammatory, antithrombotic and antiproliferative drugs were attempted. Cortisone and heparin showed low benefits in clinical trial. New drugs (rapamycin, taxol, actinomycin D, tacrolimus, estradiol, dexamethazone) with antiproliferative and antiflammatory activities are under evaluation. They act as inhibitors of the cell migration and of the cell cicle progression with different specific molecular mechanisms. The first pilot study performed in 45 patients with sirolimus-eluting stents has shown a sustained suppression (25% in the fast release group and 23% in the slow release group) of neointimal formation at 12 months after procedure with absence of restenosis. The Ravel study, a randomized trial, has enrolled 238 patients treated with sirolimus coated stent vs a control group: the results confirm the previous data with a complete suppression of intimal hyperproliferation and restenosis at six months follow-up. The first 400 patients treated in the Sirius trial a similar study which will randomize 1100 pts show a low, but not a complete inhibition of the restenotic process probably due to a more complexity of the lesions treated in comparison to Ravel trial (9.2% of restenosis). Another very promising drug is taxol (paclitaxel). It is an antiproliferative and antinflammatory molecule tested in a series of clinical trials called Taxus. The still unpublished data of TAXUS I and TAXUS II randomized trial show extremely low restenosis rate. Other drugs (actinomycin D, estradiol, tacrolimus, dexamethazone) show to have a potential effect on restenosis and neointimal proliferation and are under investigation. Is very important to maintain lessons learned from the past. The design, the type, the smooth surface of the stent still remains very important as it is a good expansion and a full coverage of the lesions with a "good stent" in the attempt to reduce restenosis. Drug-eluting stents will add further improvement.

Facebookページに参加する

科学に裏打ちされた最も完全な薬草データベース

  • 55の言語で動作します
  • 科学に裏打ちされたハーブ療法
  • 画像によるハーブの認識
  • インタラクティブGPSマップ-場所にハーブをタグ付け(近日公開)
  • 検索に関連する科学出版物を読む
  • それらの効果によって薬草を検索する
  • あなたの興味を整理し、ニュース研究、臨床試験、特許について最新情報を入手してください

症状や病気を入力し、役立つ可能性のあるハーブについて読み、ハーブを入力して、それが使用されている病気や症状を確認します。
*すべての情報は公開された科学的研究に基づいています

Google Play badgeApp Store badge