Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity: Permanent or Transient Condition?
Atslēgvārdi
Abstrakts
Apraksts
Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) has been recently included among the gluten-related diseases. Patients suffering from NCGS are diagnosed after carefully excluding celiac disease (CD) diagnosis by negative CD-specific serum antibodies and absence of intestinal villi atrophy, and excluding IgE-mediated wheat allergy, by negative serum specific IgE and/or skin prick test with wheat antigens. Then, in the absence of sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarkers for NCGS, a monitoring of the patient during elimination and re-introduction of wheat by a double-blind placebo controlled (DBPC) challenge method has been suggested as diagnostic hallmark. Obviously, this a cumbersome and time-consuming procedure which has been used in few studies.
Despite an increasing percentage of the general population define themselves as "gluten-sensitive", and by the year 2017 the market of the gluten-free products will be worth 6.6 billion of dollars, doubts persist about many aspects of NCGS. Some studies seem to suggest that wheat components other than gluten can cause the symptoms, and therefore the term "non-celiac wheat sensitivity" (NCWS) has been proposed instead of NCGS. Furthermore, while it is well known that CD is a long-life condition and a strict adherence to the gluten-free diet must be maintained, it is unknown whether this is valid for NCWS.
On the year 2012, the researchers published a retrospective study, including 276 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms who had been diagnosed with NCWS using a DBPC challenge during a ten-years period (2001-2011).
The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the persistence of the NCWS condition in that cohort and, consequently, the researchers estimated : A) how many of these patients are still following a wheat-free diet, and B) which percentage was still suffering from NCWS, diagnosed by DBPC wheat challenge, in a subgroup of that cohort.
Datumi
Pēdējoreiz pārbaudīts: | 12/31/2016 |
Pirmais iesniegtais: | 06/26/2016 |
Paredzētā reģistrācija iesniegta: | 06/29/2016 |
Pirmais izlikts: | 07/05/2016 |
Pēdējais atjauninājums iesniegts: | 01/19/2017 |
Pēdējā atjaunināšana ievietota: | 01/23/2017 |
Faktiskais studiju sākuma datums: | 06/30/2016 |
Paredzamais primārās pabeigšanas datums: | 07/31/2016 |
Paredzamais pētījuma pabeigšanas datums: | 11/30/2016 |
Stāvoklis vai slimība
Iejaukšanās / ārstēšana
Other: Patients recruitment
Fāze
Atbilstības kritēriji
Vecums, kas piemērots studijām | 18 Years Uz 18 Years |
Dzimumi, kas ir piemēroti studijām | All |
Paraugu ņemšanas metode | Probability Sample |
Pieņem veselīgus brīvprātīgos | Jā |
Kritēriji | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients previously diagnosed with NCWS by DBPC challenge. Exclusion Criteria: - The 22 patients, included in the previous study, who tested positives for anti-endomysial antibodies (EmA) in the culture medium of the duodenal biopsies, even if the villi/crypts ratio in the duodenal mucosa was normal, were excluded from the present study. |
Rezultāts
Primārie rezultāti
1. How many patients were still following a gluten-free or a wheat-free diet [Between July and November 2016]
Sekundārie iznākuma mērījumi
1. Evaluation of the effect of the GFD on IBS symptoms [Between July and November 2016]
2. Evaluation of the severity of the IBS condition [Between July and November 2016]
3. Re-evaluation of the NCWS condition by DBPC-Wheat challenge [Between July and November 2016]