Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2018-Jan

[Advancement of minimally invasive esophagectomy].

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
Yue Zhao
Yousheng Mao

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant digestive system cancers in China, which has high incidence and mortality. Nowadays, surgery remains the most important part of the comprehensive treatments. Conventional open esophagectomies are highly traumatic with high morbidity, while minimally invasive esophagectomy has been increasingly used with the development of surgical instruments and techniques in recent years. Compared with conventional open esophagectomy(OE), what are the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and which is preferable? This review briefly introduces the developing history of MIE and common procedures. Then we review large amounts of relevant literatures, comparing MIE with OE in perioperative rehabilitation, lymph node dissection and long-term survival. Results showed that compared with OE, MIE had less blood loss during operation, less postoperative pulmonary complications, shorter hospital stay and ICU time, meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the incidence of anastomotic leak, perioperative mortality, R0 resection and total number of resected lymph nodes. However, there are still no clear results of comparisons on operative time, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, and long-term survival, thus, more supportive evidences from prospective large-sample observation studies or randomized controlled trials are still needed. Furthermore, this review also presents the application and the progress of robotic-assisted MIE(RAMIE), demonstrates the current use of robotic technology during esophagectomies, meanwhile forecasts the future advancements of RAMIE. For the moment, the limitations of RAMIE to be widely used mainly include the cost and controlling of surgical indications, and we hope these can be settled in the coming years.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge