Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Annals of Vascular Surgery 2008-Mar

Carotid reconstruction in nonagenarians: is surgery a viable option?

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
Kelly L Killeen
Willis H Wagner
David V Cossman
J Louis Cohen
Rajeev K Rao
Karen Woo

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

Because of limited longevity and perceived increased perioperative risk, the optimal treatment of significant carotid stenosis in nonagenarians is controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate our results in this demographic group. A retrospective review was performed of carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) done in nonagenarians at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center between 1996 and 2006. During this period, a total of 2,038 CEAs were performed on patients of all ages. Data abstracted included demographics, patient risk factors, indications for surgery, perioperative complications, and survival. Fifty-three (2.8%) CEAs were performed as the primary procedure on 49 patients aged 90 or greater during the study period. Of these patients, 11 (22.4%) had diabetes, 38 (77.5%) had hypertension, and 31 (63.3%) had coronary artery disease. Eleven patients (22.4%) had a history of smoking, and there were no current smokers. Renal disease was present in three (6.1%) patients, one of whom was dialysis-dependent. The median length of stay was 2 days with a range of 1 to 24 days. Five patients (10.2%) required the intensive care unit following surgery. There were no postoperative strokes, and none of the patients had suffered ipsilateral stroke during follow-up. One patient (1.8%) had a perioperative myocardial infarction. One patient died in the perioperative period (1.8%). The 1-month stroke and mortality results did not differ significantly from those in patients under the age of 90, 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively (p = nonsignificant by Fisher's exact test). Using Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis, the 1- and 5-year survival rates were 84 +/- 5% and 33 +/- 9%, respectively. Our study demonstrates that in a group of well-selected nonagenarians, CEA is a safe procedure with acceptable perioperative morbidity.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge