Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2003-Oct

Current treatment and future directions in neuroblastoma.

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
Yoshiaki Tsuchida
Toshiji Shitara
Minoru Kuroiwa
Hitoshi Ikeda

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

OBJECTIVE

The International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and Pathology Classification (INPC) were applied to analyze the results of treatment of 644 patients with neuroblastoma treated in Japan during the years from 1995 to 1999, and it was found that the pathology classification (INPC) showed the strongest relevance to prognosis compared to other factors such as stage, MYNC amplification, DNA ploidy and 1p-deletion. Current results of treatment for advanced neuroblastoma are still not satisfactory, so innovative therapeutic methods have been sought during the past 10 years.

METHODS

Prospects for irinotecan and recombinant human endostatin (rhEndostatin) were studied expertimentally and clinically.

RESULTS

Irinotecan is a water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, which is isolated from a Chinese tree, Camptotheca acuminata; Its effectiveness against neuroblastoma was confirmed by in vivo preclinical studies, and phase I clinical trials in Japan concluded the maximum tolerated dose of this agent is 160-180 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days, repeated after 25 days off. Phase II trials with this dose began, and we could obtain some encouraging results with the clinical use of irinotecan. rhEndostatin has been studied in in vivo experimental models. The action of rhEndostatin was quite different from those of other cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, and continuous administration of this substance showed a more marked anti-effect than its intermittent use.

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan appears to be promising when it is given to the patients neuroblastoma, whereas rhEndostatin needs to have more preclinical studies before it is used in patients.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge