Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008-Apr

Danshen (Chinese medicinal herb) preparations for acute myocardial infarction.

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
Taixiang Wu
Juan Ni
Jiafu Wu

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most important cause of morbidity from ischaemic heart disease, and is among the leading causes of death in the western world. Danshen, a Chinese herbal medicine, is widely used in China for treatment of several diseases, including AMI.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects (both benefits and harms) of danshen preparations for AMI.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966-2006), EMBASE (1980-2006), and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982-2006). We also handsearched 75 Chinese medical journals.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) lasting at least 7 days were sought. Since it seemed evident that few RCTs were available, we also considered other controlled studies.

METHODS

Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by three reviewers.

RESULTS

Six studies comprised of 2368 participants were included. Only one trial was judged to be a genuine RCT and showed no statistically significant difference in reduction of total mortality (Peto OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.32), but a quasi-RCT reported a reduced total mortality (Peto OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.77). Pooling these trials yielded an approximate halving of mortality in those patients treated with danshen preparations plus usual care compared with usual care alone (Peto OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence to support use of danshen preparations is too weak to make any judgement about its effects. Evidence from RCTs is insufficient and of low quality. The safety of danshen preparations is unproven, although some adverse events have been reported. More evidence from high quality trials is needed to support the clinical use of danshen preparations.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge