Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Revista Argentina de Microbiologia 1993

[Diagnosis of entero-invasive Escherichia coli associated with diarrhea].

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
I Chinen
M Rivas
M I Caffer
R O Cinto
N Binsztein

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

Sixteen Escherichia coli strains isolated from diarrhea patients, characterized as enteroinvasive (EIEC) by the keratoconjunctivitis test (Sereny test), and 15 non-EIEC strains, were studied. The aim of this study was to establish a possible correlation between the Sereny test and several other tests as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and biochemical markers, which are more easily accessible to general practice laboratories. Strains were assayed for the virulence marker antigen (the outer membrane proteins) by direct ELISA, biochemical tests, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and serotyping. Mean optical density (OD) values in the ELISA were 2.018 +/- 0.336 for EIEC strains, and 0.569 +/- 0.283 for non-EIEC strains. Difference between the OD values of the two groups was found to be significant at p < 0.01 by the one-tailed Student's test. One (6.2%) of the 16 Sereny test-positive strains was negative by ELISA. Considered as a group, the EIEC strains are rather heterogeneous in their biochemical characteristics. Lysine decarboxylase test appeared as the most relevant assay, since all EIEC strains were negative for this enzyme, whereas 66.7% of non-EIEC strains were positive. Other helpful tests performed for strain characterization were: gas production from glucose and from glycerol, sucrose and salicin fermentation, and esculin hydrolysis (p < 0.01). However, strains behaviour was variable with these tests. Differences between both groups of strains with regard to mucate utilization and dulcitol fermentation was significative only to a 5% level. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns showed differences between EIEC and non-EIEC strains: 37.5% of the former vs 80% of the latter, were resistant to at least four of the antibiotics tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge