Intra-articular osteoid osteoma: diagnostic imaging in three cases.

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience pertaining to three cases of intra-articular osteoid osteoma assessed by means of integrated imaging and review of literature.

METHODS

Medical records, radiologic and nuclear medicine findings pertaining to three cases of intra-articular osteoid osteoma were retrospectively evaluated and compared with those of surgery. All the patients (2 males, one female; age range 8-38 ys) affected by intra-articular osteoid osteoma respectively of the elbow, tibio-talar joint and hip were evaluated by means of radiographic examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). SE T1-w and T2-w, GRE T2*-w, GRE 3D T1-w and STIR pulse sequences were used and axial, coronal and sagittal images were acquired. Two patients underwent CT scan. One patient underwent skeletal scintigraphy. All the patients underwent surgery.

RESULTS

In 2 out of 3 cases plain radiography allowed the radiologist to suspect the presence of the lesion. In the remaining one, plain radiography failed to detect both the nidus and the perilesional osteosclerosis; nevertheless, a small osteochondral erosion of the humeral condyle suggested the presence of joint inflammation, thus leading to further investigation. CT scan well depicted the presence of the nidus and, in one case, the presence of joint effusion. MRI was always able to detect the nidus, which presented as lesion of low to intermediate signal in T1-w images, low signal in the T2-w images in one patient and high signal in the remaining two; in these latter STIR images showed high intensity nidus and edema of neighbouring cancellous bone. Furthermore, in all patients MRI clearly depicted joint effusion. Skeletal scintigraphy demonstrated both the lesion and the inflammatory involvement of neighbouring soft tissue. In all patients histologic specimen confirmed the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma with joint inflammation and synovitis.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results and literature data the pre-surgical diagnosis of osteoid osteoma is very difficult to achieve. Indeed, only the combination of clinical information and radiologic and nuclear medicine findings enables the radiologist to make the right diagnosis.