Latvian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie 2002-Mar

[Skin prick test results in snoring and sleep apnea patients].

Rakstu tulkošanu var veikt tikai reģistrēti lietotāji
Ielogoties Reģistrēties
Saite tiek saglabāta starpliktuvē
R Riemann
E Riemann
C Milewski

Atslēgvārdi

Abstrakts

BACKGROUND

In allergic rhinitis, nasal obstruction is a typical symptom. Reduced nasal ventilation is thought to be one causal factor for sleep breathing disorders. Whether or not snoring individuals with or without sleep apnea show more frequent or stronger reactions in skin prick tests (SPT) compared to non-snorers has not been investigated yet.

METHODS

SPT on 20 most frequent allergens and standardized questionnaires of 412 patients of either sex who received a polysomnography at the sleeplab of the ENT department, University of Würzburg, Germany, were analysed retrospectively. In 351 patients (85 %), data were complete. According to their polysomnography, patients were grouped into snorers (n = 248, 71 %) and non-snorers (n = 103, 29 %) or apnea (apnea-hypopnea-index > 10; n = 171, 49 %) and non-apnea patients (n = 180, 51 %). Average occurrence or strength of skin reactions was compared between these groups.

RESULTS

Except plantain (7 % vs. 1 %) and beech (10 % vs. 3 %), there were no statistical increases in the average occurrence or strength of SPT results in snoring individuals. Apnea patients did not show more frequent or stronger allergic skin reactions than non-apnea patients. Three patients suffering from allergic rhinitis by house dust mites were treated with citerizin 10 mg and allergen exposition prophylaxis. Three months after onset of therapy in all three patients, a reduction of snoring was polysomnographically observed. Snorers or apnea patients complaining sneezing, reduced nasal ventilation at night, hyperlacrimation or rhinorrhea showed significant higher numbers of allergic skin reactions for rye, gras and house dust mites compared to patients without these symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The results reveal that only snorers or apnea patients with specific symptoms for allergic rhinitis should be tested by SPT. A general SPT-screening seems not to be indicated. Snoring and apneas in patients with allergic rhinitis due to house dust mites can be eliminated or reduced by an oral antihistaminic treatment.

Pievienojieties mūsu
facebook lapai

Vispilnīgākā ārstniecības augu datu bāze, kuru atbalsta zinātne

  • Darbojas 55 valodās
  • Zāļu ārstniecības līdzekļi, kurus atbalsta zinātne
  • Garšaugu atpazīšana pēc attēla
  • Interaktīva GPS karte - atzīmējiet garšaugus atrašanās vietā (drīzumā)
  • Lasiet zinātniskās publikācijas, kas saistītas ar jūsu meklēšanu
  • Meklēt ārstniecības augus pēc to iedarbības
  • Organizējiet savas intereses un sekojiet līdzi jaunumiem, klīniskajiem izmēģinājumiem un patentiem

Ierakstiet simptomu vai slimību un izlasiet par garšaugiem, kas varētu palīdzēt, ierakstiet zāli un redziet slimības un simptomus, pret kuriem tā tiek lietota.
* Visa informācija ir balstīta uz publicētiem zinātniskiem pētījumiem

Google Play badgeApp Store badge