Mongolian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Pars-plana Vitrectomy vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Severe NPDR

Зөвхөн бүртгэлтэй хэрэглэгчид л нийтлэл орчуулах боломжтой
Нэвтрэх / Бүртгүүлэх
Холбоосыг санах ойд хадгалдаг
СтатусАжилд авах
Ивээн тэтгэгчид
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Түлхүүр үгс

Хураангуй

It is estimated that there are about 600 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients all over the world until 2040,and almost 50% of whom have some degree of diabetic retinopathy (DR) at any given time. About 5% to 10% diabetic retinopathy would develop vision-threatening complications, including proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), capillary non-perfusion, or macular edema. Data from the DRS suggest that given long enough duration of diabetes, approximately 60% of patients with DR will develop PDR, and without intervention, 75% nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) will development PDR within 1 year follow up, 45% will develop high-risk PDR, nearly half of PDR will experience profound visual loss. panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) only reduced 50% risk of sever visual loss and about 25% of the sNPDR patients who finished PRP need Pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) in a 5 year follow up.
Vitreous have been proven to play an important role in the development of NPDR to PDR, which were the collection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) factors and the major component of proliferative lesion in the later stage of PDR.
Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy has been shown as a safe and effective method in the treatment of PDR, through removing the pathological vitreous, proliferative membrane and also the VEGF factors. However, whether or not Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy will be more effective than PRP to control the progression of NDPR remained unknown.

Огноо

Сүүлд баталгаажуулсан: 12/31/2019
Эхлээд оруулсан: 09/22/2019
Тооцоолсон элсэлтийг оруулсан: 09/22/2019
Эхлээд нийтэлсэн: 09/24/2019
Сүүлийн шинэчлэлтийг оруулсан: 01/05/2020
Сүүлийн шинэчлэлтийг нийтэлсэн: 01/08/2020
Сургалтын бодит эхлэх огноо: 12/03/2019
Тооцоолсон анхан шатны ажил дуусах огноо: 12/30/2021
Судалгааны ажлыг дуусгах өдөр: 12/30/2024

Нөхцөл байдал эсвэл өвчин

Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Хөндлөнгийн оролцоо / эмчилгээ

Procedure: Group A

Procedure: Group B

Үе шат

-

Arm Groups

ГарХөндлөнгийн оролцоо / эмчилгээ
Experimental: Group A
Prompt panretinal photocoagulation
Procedure: Group A
Study eyes that receive panretinal photocoagulation (prompt PRP eyes at baseline) should have 1200 to1600 burns with a spot size on the retina of approximately 500 microns given over 1 to 3 sittings and completed within 4 weeks of initiation
Experimental: Group B
Micro-invasive Pars-plana vitrectomy
Procedure: Group B
Study eyes that receive standard 25G Pars-plana vitrectomy that remove all the vitreous, without laser or Silicone oil tamponade, but filled with perfusion fluid. Surgery should be completed within 4 weeks after randomization.

Эрхийн шалгуур

Суралцах боломжтой нас 18 Years Хэнд 18 Years
Суралцах боломжтой хүйсAll
Эрүүл сайн дурын ажилтнуудыг хүлээн авдагТийм ээ
Шалгуур үзүүлэлтүүд

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Aged ≥18 years, male or female

2. Type 1 or type 2 diabetes

3. Presence of severe NPDR according to the diagnosis of 4-2-1 rule,

One or more of the following, in the absence of PDR:

- More than 20 intraretinal hemorrhages in each of four quadrants

- Definite venous beading in two or more quadrants

- Prominent intraretinal microvascular abnormality (IRMA) in one or more quadrants

4. Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity letter score > 24 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/320) on the day of randomization.

5. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient to administer PRP and obtain adequate fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

6. Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant

2. In the opinion of the investigator, A condition that would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).

3. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied.

4. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110).

*If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.

5. Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization

6. Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization

* These drugs should not be used during the study

7. For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 3 years.

* Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed

8. History of prior panretinal photocoagulation (prior PRP is defined as ≥100 burns outside of the posterior pole

9. If macular edema is present, it is considered to be primarily due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.

10. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., retinal vein or artery occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).

11. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye were otherwise normal).

12. History of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment at any time in the past 2 months

13. History of corticosteroid treatment (intravitreal or peribulbar) at any time in the past 4 months.

14. History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.

15. History of laser capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization

16. Aphakia.

17. Uncontrolled glaucoma (in investigator's judgment).

18. Exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis.

Үр дүн

Анхан шатны үр дүнгийн арга хэмжээ

1. progression rate of severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy [12 months]

the number of patients with severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy progressed to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in each group from the baseline to 12 months

Хоёрдогч үр дүнгийн арга хэмжээ

1. the change of best corrected visual acuity [12 months]

The mean change in best corrected visual acuity in each group from baseline to 12 months

2. the rate of re-treatment [12 months]

The number of patients who need re-treatment including supplement laser or vitrectomy from baseline to 12 months

3. The occurrence of diabetic macular edema [12 months]

The occurrence number of diabetic macular edema in each group from baseline to 12 months

4. The change of central retinal thickness [12 months]

the change of central retinal thickness from baseline to 12 months

5. The change of visual field [12 months]

the change of visual field from baseline to 12 months

6. The occurrence of cataract [12 months]

the occurrence of cataract from baseline to 12 months

7. The change of quality of life [12 months]

the change of quality of life as assessed by questionnaire at 12 months

Манай facebook
хуудсанд нэгдээрэй

Шинжлэх ухаанаар баталгаажсан эмийн өвс ургамлын бүрэн мэдээллийн сан

  • 55 хэл дээр ажилладаг
  • Шинжлэх ухааны үндэслэсэн ургамлын гаралтай эдгэрэлт
  • Ургамлыг дүрсээр таних
  • Интерактив GPS газрын зураг - эмийн ургамлыг байршлаар нь тэмдэглэнэ (удахгүй)
  • Хайлттай холбоотой шинжлэх ухааны нийтлэлүүдийг уншина уу
  • Эмийн өвсийг үр нөлөөгөөр нь хайж олох
  • Мэдээллийн судалгаа, клиник туршилт, патентыг цаг тухайд нь сонирхож, зохион байгуул

Шинж тэмдэг эсвэл өвчний талаар бичиж, тус болох ургамлын талаар уншиж, өвслөг ургамлыг бичиж, өвчний эсрэг шинж тэмдгийг үзээрэй.
* Бүх мэдээлэл нь хэвлэгдсэн эрдэм шинжилгээний судалгаанд үндэслэсэн болно

Google Play badgeApp Store badge