Mongolian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2010-Jan

Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.

Зөвхөн бүртгэлтэй хэрэглэгчид л нийтлэл орчуулах боломжтой
Нэвтрэх / Бүртгүүлэх
Холбоосыг санах ойд хадгалдаг
Sabine Kurz
Frank Krummenauer
Hagen Thieme
H Burkhard Dick

Түлхүүр үгс

Хураангуй

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the results of biaxial microincision and coaxial small-incision surgery in patients with cataract with coexisting exfoliation syndrome, uveitis, anterior or posterior synechias, phacodonesis, or previous intraocular surgery over an 8-week follow-up.

METHODS

Department of Ophthalmology, Mainz University, Mainz, Germany.

METHODS

Eyes were prospectively assigned (1:1) to have biaxial microincision (<1.5 mm) phacoemulsification or coaxial small-incision (2.8 mm) phacoemulsification using pulsed ultrasound energy (Sovereign WhiteStar) with variable duty cycles followed by implantation of a microincision intraocular lens. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), laser flare photometry values, effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), and endothelial cell count (ECC) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 94 eyes. There were no statistically significant differences between the techniques in intraoperative or postoperative complications. The most frequent postoperative complications were corneal edema surrounding the incision (40%, biaxial group; 35%, coaxial group), pupil distortion (3% versus 7%), and fibrin exudation (3% versus 3%). No other postoperative complications occurred. The median EPT was statistically significantly shorter (1.34 seconds versus 5.4 seconds) and the median phaco power significantly lower (3.3% versus 12.9%) in the biaxial group than in the coaxial group (P<.001). There were no differences between groups in CDVA, laser flare photometry values, or ECC.

CONCLUSIONS

The EPT was shorter and the mean phaco power lower with biaxial phacoemulsification, perhaps because of better access of the phaco handpiece for grooving the nucleus with this technique. The 2 techniques were comparable in intraoperative and postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND

No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Манай facebook
хуудсанд нэгдээрэй

Шинжлэх ухаанаар баталгаажсан эмийн өвс ургамлын бүрэн мэдээллийн сан

  • 55 хэл дээр ажилладаг
  • Шинжлэх ухааны үндэслэсэн ургамлын гаралтай эдгэрэлт
  • Ургамлыг дүрсээр таних
  • Интерактив GPS газрын зураг - эмийн ургамлыг байршлаар нь тэмдэглэнэ (удахгүй)
  • Хайлттай холбоотой шинжлэх ухааны нийтлэлүүдийг уншина уу
  • Эмийн өвсийг үр нөлөөгөөр нь хайж олох
  • Мэдээллийн судалгаа, клиник туршилт, патентыг цаг тухайд нь сонирхож, зохион байгуул

Шинж тэмдэг эсвэл өвчний талаар бичиж, тус болох ургамлын талаар уншиж, өвслөг ургамлыг бичиж, өвчний эсрэг шинж тэмдгийг үзээрэй.
* Бүх мэдээлэл нь хэвлэгдсэн эрдэм шинжилгээний судалгаанд үндэслэсэн болно

Google Play badgeApp Store badge