Portuguese
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Kathmandu University Medical Journal

Validation of the proposed clinical diagnostic criteria of enteric fever.

Apenas usuários registrados podem traduzir artigos
Entrar Inscrever-se
O link é salvo na área de transferência
A Neopane
S Panta

Palavras-chave

Resumo

BACKGROUND

Enteric fever is very common infectious disease in developing countries like Nepal. Due to lack of resources diagnosis has to be clinical most of the time. Hence a proposal of clinical diagnostic criteria and validation of the same would be very useful.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the proposed clinical diagnostic criterion including features characterized as major and minor criteria.

METHODS

This study was done in the department of medicine of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching hospital, from June 2009 to January 2012. A total of 114 patients presenting with fever were included in the study. After proposal of clinical diagnostic criteria for enteric fever, by a prior published study, all the fever patients were grouped according to criteria positive or negative. The most significant criteria were validated by calculating sensitivity and specificity along with positive and negative likelihood ratios with blood culture taken as gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were enrolled. Total patients diagnosed as enteric was 47.3 %. Clinical diagnostic criterion B which included three major (headache, fever and relative bradycardia) and three minor criteria (abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, splenomegaly and chills) was highly significant (p=<.0001) in diagnosing enteric fever and had a sensitivity of 72.2% ( 95% CI 58.1- 83.1) and specificity of 98.3% ( 95% CI 89.8-99-9). The positive likelihood ratio was 43.33 (95 % CI 6.16-304.77) and negative likelihood ratio as 0.28 (95% CI 0.18-0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical diagnostic criteria can be a very useful tool for diagnosis of enteric fever when culture facility is not available.

Junte-se à nossa
página do facebook

O mais completo banco de dados de ervas medicinais apoiado pela ciência

  • Funciona em 55 idiomas
  • Curas herbais apoiadas pela ciência
  • Reconhecimento de ervas por imagem
  • Mapa GPS interativo - marcar ervas no local (em breve)
  • Leia publicações científicas relacionadas à sua pesquisa
  • Pesquise ervas medicinais por seus efeitos
  • Organize seus interesses e mantenha-se atualizado com as notícias de pesquisa, testes clínicos e patentes

Digite um sintoma ou doença e leia sobre ervas que podem ajudar, digite uma erva e veja as doenças e sintomas contra os quais ela é usada.
* Todas as informações são baseadas em pesquisas científicas publicadas

Google Play badgeApp Store badge