Slovak
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Therapeutics 2019-Jul

Potential Pharmacologic Targets for the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Články môžu prekladať iba registrovaní používatelia
Prihlásiť Registrácia
Odkaz sa uloží do schránky
John Isaacs
Kundan Iqbal

Kľúčové slová

Abstrakt

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) immunopathology starts many years before clinical disease manifests. An early event is the breakdown in B-cell tolerance and the emergence of autoantibodies. Some years later, the autoantibody response matures, with epitope spreading and isotype switching suggesting more focused T-cell involvement. Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines appear concurrently, marking a phase of preclinical inflammation. Eventually individuals develop musculoskeletal symptoms and fatigue, heralding the imminent onset of synovitis. The prevention of RA can be aligned to these disease stages, which may simplistically be viewed as breach of tolerance, maturation of autoimmunity, and subclinical inflammation. At each stage, an "ethical" balance must be struck between the potential for benefit versus harm, in large part determined by the likelihood of progression to RA. In particular, tolerogenic interventions should be favored during asymptomatic disease, providing long-lasting, possibly lifelong, benefit from a short-term intervention. During the breach-of-tolerance phase, tolerogenic interventions might involve the administration of autoantigenic peptides in an attempt to shut down autoreactive B cells. The peptides may be "naked," encapsulated in nanoparticles or loaded into autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells. It may also be possible to interfere with antigen generation and presentation, such as via peptidyl arginine deiminase inhibition. Attempts to interfere with B cells via depletion, differentiation, or intracellular signaling are also logical at this stage, if deemed sufficiently well tolerated. These interventions remain relevant during maturation of autoimmunity, but targeted T-cell interventions also become relevant, such as co-stimulation blockade and, potentially, interventions that target intracellular signaling pathways within T cells. Targeting of interleukin 23 during this phase may interfere with maturation of the autoantibody response by modulating autoantibody glycosylation, as well as by inhibiting T-helper 17 differentiation. During the phase of subclinical inflammation, targeting cytokines and chemokines could conceivably prevent progression to RA. Furthermore, tolerance induction is opposed by systemic inflammation and, during this phase, it may be necessary to consider therapeutic combinations of tolerogenic and antiinflammatory interventions.

Pripojte sa k našej
facebookovej stránke

Najkompletnejšia databáza liečivých bylín podporovaná vedou

  • Pracuje v 55 jazykoch
  • Bylinné lieky podporené vedou
  • Rozpoznávanie bylín podľa obrázka
  • Interaktívna GPS mapa - označte byliny na mieste (už čoskoro)
  • Prečítajte si vedecké publikácie týkajúce sa vášho hľadania
  • Vyhľadajte liečivé byliny podľa ich účinkov
  • Usporiadajte svoje záujmy a držte krok s novinkami, klinickými skúškami a patentmi

Zadajte príznak alebo chorobu a prečítajte si o bylinách, ktoré by vám mohli pomôcť, napíšte bylinu a pozrite sa na choroby a príznaky, proti ktorým sa používa.
* Všetky informácie sú založené na publikovanom vedeckom výskume

Google Play badgeApp Store badge