Albanian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Separation Science 2008-Oct

GC-MS fingerprints for discrimination of Ligusticum chuanxiong from Angelica.

Vetëm përdoruesit e regjistruar mund të përkthejnë artikuj
Identifikohuni Regjistrohu
Lidhja ruhet në kujtesën e fragmenteve
Baijuan Yang
Junhui Chen
Frank Sen-Chun Lee
Xiaoru Wang

Fjalë kyçe

Abstrakt

A GC-MS fingerprinting technique based on the essential oil components has been developed for the discrimination of chuanxiong against Chinese Angelica (Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels) or other herbs with similar compositions. The analytical performance of four different extraction methods for the separation of essential oil components have been compared and these include: ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), Soxhlet extraction (SHE) and hydro-distillation extraction (HDE). The results showed that UAE was the most effective extraction method, and the operational parameters of UAE were optimized. 3-Butylphthalide, Z-butylidenephthalide, senkyunolide I, senkyunolide H, E-butylidenephthalide, senkyunolide A, neocnidilide, Z-ligustilide and E-ligustilide were tentatively identified in chromatograms of chuanxiong based on their GC-EI-MS data. Similarity coefficient calculations based on correlation methods have been performed on the GC-MS fingerprints. Using an authentic standard Chuanxiong as the reference, the similarity coefficients between the standard and all other chuanxiong samples ranged from 0.90 to 1.0 (with 1.0 being the perfect match), which as a group can be readily separated from the Angelica samples for which the similarity index against the chuanxiong standard ranged from 0.75 to 0.77. Conversely, when an authentic Angelica standard was used as the reference, the respective similarity coefficients fall in the range of 0.70-0.75 and 0.98-1.00 for the chuanxiong and Angelica sample groups. Our results thus demonstrate that the fingerprinting technique developed in the study can indeed discriminate the two herbs with high reliability.

Bashkohuni në faqen
tonë në facebook

Baza e të dhënave më e plotë e bimëve medicinale e mbështetur nga shkenca

  • Punon në 55 gjuhë
  • Kurime bimore të mbështetura nga shkenca
  • Njohja e bimëve nga imazhi
  • Harta GPS interaktive - etiketoni bimët në vendndodhje (së shpejti)
  • Lexoni botime shkencore në lidhje me kërkimin tuaj
  • Kërkoni bimë medicinale nga efektet e tyre
  • Organizoni interesat tuaja dhe qëndroni në azhurnim me kërkimet e lajmeve, provat klinike dhe patentat

Shkruani një simptomë ose një sëmundje dhe lexoni në lidhje me barërat që mund të ndihmojnë, shtypni një barishte dhe shikoni sëmundjet dhe simptomat që përdoren kundër.
* I gjithë informacioni bazohet në kërkimin shkencor të botuar

Google Play badgeApp Store badge