Serbian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Chemotherapy 2001-Nov

Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery: clean non-implant wounds.

Само регистровани корисници могу преводити чланке
Пријави се / Пријави се
Веза се чува у привремену меморију
D J Leaper
A G Melling

Кључне речи

Апстрактан

Wound infection after clean surgery (the majority being hernia, varicose vein and breast surgery) is often greatly underestimated. If a trained and blinded observer is involved using close and prolonged surveillance to at least 30 days postoperatively with appropriate definitions or wound scores, an infection rate of up to 15% or more may be found. Equally controversial is the value of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing postoperative wound infection; there is no clear cut evidence of efficacy and some random controlled trials (RCTs) have shown no differences at all. There is a need for guidelines to be drawn up but further RCTs may be needed. An alternative to antibiotics is the systemic warming of patients or the local warming of the operative site prior to surgery. In day case surgery in particular, patients may have been deprived of fluids for 12h prior to surgery; they may become cold whilst waiting for surgery dressed in a theatre gown; and their apprehension may not be controlled with anxiolytics. The inflammatory response may be obtunded with an increased risk of superadded infection or poor healing in cutaneous tissue resulting in wound separation and fat necrosis. Only a third of sampled purulent discharges grow skin organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus or epidermidis. In a study of 421 patients the 138 randomly assigned to local warming (Warm Up, Augustine Medical) had a wound infection rate of 3.6% compared with another group of 139 randomly assigned to systemic warming (Bair Hugger, Augustine Medical) of 5.8%. A standard-treated third group of 139 had a wound infection rate of 13.7% (P<0.001). The warmed patients also had significantly lower wound scores based on 4 systems, had higher skin temperatures and capillary flow prior to surgery and were prescribed fewer postoperative antibiotics by their family doctors in the 6 postoperative weeks (15.9% vs 6.5%; P=0.002). Wound infections are more common than generally accepted if they are looked for by close surveillance. Antibiotics may be avoided by the use of warming with the lessening of the risks of allergy, resistance and emergence. It is uncertain whether antibiotic prophylaxis has a role in clean wound surgery. Breast surgery carries the highest risk of wound infection and this may risk delay in receiving planned adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Perioperative warming of the operative site may be of greatest value in this group of patients.

Придружите се нашој
facebook страници

Најкомплетнија база лековитог биља подржана науком

  • Ради на 55 језика
  • Биљни лекови потпомогнути науком
  • Препознавање биљака по слици
  • Интерактивна ГПС мапа - означите биље на локацији (ускоро)
  • Читајте научне публикације повезане са вашом претрагом
  • Претражите лековито биље по њиховим ефектима
  • Организујте своја интересовања и будите у току са истраживањем вести, клиничким испитивањима и патентима

Упишите симптом или болест и прочитајте о биљкама које би могле да помогну, укуцајте неку биљку и погледајте болести и симптоме против којих се користи.
* Све информације се заснивају на објављеним научним истраживањима

Google Play badgeApp Store badge