Ukrainian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics 2019-07

Intracranial subdural empyemas and epidural abscesses in children

Тільки зареєстровані користувачі можуть перекладати статті
Увійти Зареєструватися
Посилання зберігається в буфері обміну
Paige Lundy
Christian Kaufman
David Garcia
Michael Partington
Paul Grabb

Ключові слова

Анотація

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of children with intracranial subdural empyemas (SEs) and epidural abscesses (EAs) to highlight the important clinical difference between these two entities. They describe the delays and pitfalls in achieving accurate diagnoses and make treatment recommendations based on clinical and imaging findings.They reviewed their experience with children who had presented with intracranial SE and/or EA in the period from January 2013 to May 2018. They recorded presenting complaint, date of presentation, age, neurological examination findings, time from presentation to diagnosis, any errors in initial image interpretation, timing from diagnosis to surgical intervention, type of surgical intervention, neurological outcome, and microbiology data. They aimed to assess possible causes of any delay in diagnosis or surgical intervention.Sixteen children with SE and/or EA had undergone evaluation by the authors’ neurosurgical service since 2013. Children with SE (n = 14) presented with unmistakable evidence of CNS involvement with only one exception. Children with EA alone (n = 2) had no evidence of CNS dysfunction. All children older than 1 year of age had sinusitis.The time from initial presentation to a physician to diagnosis ranged from 0 to 21 days with a mean and median of 4.5 and 6 days, respectively. The time from diagnosis to neurosurgical intervention ranged from 0 to 14 days with a mean and median of 3 and 1 day, respectively. Delay in treatment was due to misinterpretation of images, a failure to perform timely imaging, progression on imaging as an indication for surgical intervention, or the managing clinician’s preference. Among the 14 cases with SE, initial imaging studies in 6 were not interpreted as showing SE. Four SE collections were dictated as epidural even on MRI. The only fatality was associated with no surgical intervention. Endoscopic sinus surgery was not associated with reducing the need for repeat craniotomy.Regardless of the initial imaging interpretation, any child presenting with focal neurological deficit or seizures and sinusitis should be assumed to have an SE or meningitis, and a careful review of high-resolution imaging, ideally MRI with contrast, should be performed. If an extraaxial collection is identified, surgical drainage should be performed expeditiously. Neurosurgical involvement and evaluation are imperative to achieve timely diagnoses and to guide management in these critically ill children.EA = epidural abscess; SE = subdural empyema.

Приєднуйтесь до нашої
сторінки у Facebook

Найповніша база даних про лікарські трави, підкріплена наукою

  • Працює 55 мовами
  • Лікування травами за підтримки науки
  • Розпізнавання трав за зображенням
  • Інтерактивна GPS-карта - позначайте трави на місці (скоро)
  • Читайте наукові публікації, пов’язані з вашим пошуком
  • Шукайте лікарські трави за їх впливом
  • Організуйте свої інтереси та будьте в курсі новинних досліджень, клінічних випробувань та патентів

Введіть симптом або хворобу та прочитайте про трави, які можуть допомогти, наберіть траву та ознайомтесь із захворюваннями та симптомами, проти яких вона застосовується.
* Вся інформація базується на опублікованих наукових дослідженнях

Google Play badgeApp Store badge