Ukrainian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Otology and Neurotology 2006-Apr

Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation.

Тільки зареєстровані користувачі можуть перекладати статті
Увійти Зареєструватися
Посилання зберігається в буфері обміну
Ted A Meyer
Paul A Canty
Eric P Wilkinson
Marlan R Hansen
Jay T Rubinstein
Bruce J Gantz

Ключові слова

Анотація

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate factors affecting outcomes of small acoustic neuroma (AN) removal via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach, and compare results to published data on observation and radiation therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Academic tertiary referral center.

METHODS

162 consecutive patients (ages 19-70) with unilateral AN (0.2-2.5 cm in largest dimension) removed through a MCF approach were reviewed focusing on preservation of hearing, facial nerve function and complications. One hundred thirteen patients had pre-operative word recognition scores (WRS)>70%.

RESULTS

Both tumor size and pre-operative WRS were related to post-operative WRS (p<0.01). Overall, at least some hearing was preserved in 94 (60%) of the 156 patients who had hearing before surgery. If the WRS was also >70% (N=113), 56 (50%) maintained WRS>70%. Importantly, WRS for 12 others improved to >70% after surgery. When the patients were stratified by tumor size, the patients with small tumors (2-10 mm) faired better than the overall group. At least some hearing was preserved in 65 (72%) of the 90 patients. If the WRS was also >70% (N=66), 39 (59%) maintained WRS>70%. WRS for eight others improved to >70% after surgery. When the tumor was 1.1-1.4 cm (N=34), the chance of preserving some hearing decreased to 42% (14/33). If the WRS was also >70% (N=23), 9 (39%) maintained WRS>70%. WRS for three others improved to >70% after surgery. When the tumor reached 1.5-2.5 cm (N=35), the hearing preservation rate was 43%. If the WRS was also >70% (N=24), only eight (33%) maintained WRS of 70%, and one other improved to >70%. The addition of intra-operative whole eighth nerve near field monitoring improved results during small tumor (70% WRS in 76% (22/29) of those with >70% pre-operative WRS. Good facial nerve function (HB I-II) was achieved in 97% (86% HB I). When tumor size was

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that removal of unilateral AN through an MCF approach when the tumor is small and hearing is good provides the best opportunity for hearing preservation and normal facial nerve function. Observation historically results in tumor growth in young and middle-age patients with subsequent hearing loss. Radiation may prevent most tumors from growing, and more data are needed to determine long-term tumor control and hearing preservation rates.

Приєднуйтесь до нашої
сторінки у Facebook

Найповніша база даних про лікарські трави, підкріплена наукою

  • Працює 55 мовами
  • Лікування травами за підтримки науки
  • Розпізнавання трав за зображенням
  • Інтерактивна GPS-карта - позначайте трави на місці (скоро)
  • Читайте наукові публікації, пов’язані з вашим пошуком
  • Шукайте лікарські трави за їх впливом
  • Організуйте свої інтереси та будьте в курсі новинних досліджень, клінічних випробувань та патентів

Введіть симптом або хворобу та прочитайте про трави, які можуть допомогти, наберіть траву та ознайомтесь із захворюваннями та симптомами, проти яких вона застосовується.
* Вся інформація базується на опублікованих наукових дослідженнях

Google Play badgeApp Store badge