中文(简体)
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)

Improving Skin Cancer Management With Artificial Intelligence (04.17 SMARTI)

只有注册用户可以翻译文章
登陆注册
链接已保存到剪贴板
状态招聘中
赞助商
Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limited
合作者
Molemap Australia Pty Ltd
Monash University, Melbourne

关键词

抽象

The study is designed to be able to prove if the Molemap Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm can be used as a diagnostic aid in a clinical setting. This study will determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of the Molemap AI algorithm is comparable to a specialist dermatologist, teledermatologist and registrar (as a surrogate for a general practitioner). The study patient population will be adult patients who require skin cancer assessment.
The use of AI as a diagnostic aid may assist primary care physicians who have variable skill in skin cancer diagnosis and lead to more appropriate referrals (rapid referral for lesions requiring treatment and fewer referrals for benign lesions), thereby improving access and reducing waiting times for specialist care.

描述

This is a pilot study which aims to establish whether artificial intelligence can be used as a diagnostic aid to improve diagnostic accuracy and outcomes in the specialist setting prior to conducting a much larger trial of the intervention in primary care.

Objectives:

1. To establish whether the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence system is on par with teledermatologists' clinical assessment.

2. To establish the safety and feasibility of offering artificial intelligence as a diagnostic aid prior to conducting a large trial of the intervention in primary care.

Hypotheses:

1. The AI algorithm will have diagnostic accuracy comparable with a teledermatologists' assessment.

2. The AI algorithm will have a diagnostic accuracy more conservative (i.e. more false positives) than dermatologists in the clinical setting.

3. The AI algorithm will have greater diagnostic accuracy than the registrar.

4. The AI algorithm will lead to a reduction in the number of biopsies performed by the registrar the likely impact of which will be reduced cost to patients and the healthcare system.

Trial Design:

The pilot study will take place in specialist dermatology and melanoma clinics in Victoria, Australia. Potential participants will be identified and screened at the general dermatology and melanoma clinics by the clinic doctors who deem the participant meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Intervention:

Photography of lesions using a MoleMap camera device with automated artificial intelligence providing an assessment of the lesion in real time.

This pilot study will be a before and after intervention trial design. For the initial 'lead-in' phase, no AI diagnosis will be provided back to the treating clinicians. This phase will be used for prospective data collection.

For the intervention phase, an AI diagnosis will be provided to the dermatology registrar (who is used in this pilot study as a surrogate for the GP) and dermatologist after they have both assessed the patient clinically. Management of the lesion will be determined by the dermatologist and recorded.

The safety of the device will be determined by its use in the setting of specialist dermatology clinics to ensure that patients are receiving the highest standard of care with a dermatologist providing a clinical diagnosis and management for all lesions tested.

It is anticipated that the full trial will expand to include multiple sites across Australia and New Zealand.

日期

最后验证: 08/31/2019
首次提交: 07/28/2019
提交的预估入学人数: 07/28/2019
首次发布: 07/30/2019
上次提交的更新: 09/29/2019
最近更新发布: 10/01/2019
实际学习开始日期: 09/30/2019
预计主要完成日期: 09/30/2020
预计完成日期: 09/30/2020

状况或疾病

Skin Cancer
Melanoma (Skin)

干预/治疗

Device: Active phase

-

手臂组

干预/治疗
No Intervention: Lead-in phase
During the lead-in phase treating clinicians will not be given the Molemap artificial intelligence diagnosis in real-time (i.e. in clinic with the patient).
Active Comparator: Active phase
During the active phase treating clinicians will be given the Molemap artificial intelligence diagnosis in real-time.
Device: Active phase
This device/software incorporates artificial intelligence to provide a diagnostic aide for clinicians of patients with potentially malignant skin lesions. The software is supported by the use of cameras for acquisition of images.

资格标准

有资格学习的年龄 18 Years 至 18 Years
有资格学习的性别All
接受健康志愿者
标准

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients attending the specialist dermatology clinics for skin cancer assessment or surveillance.

2. Patients may or may not have a lesion of concern.

3. Patients must have at least two lesions imaged during full skin examination by a dermatologist.

4. Age greater than 18 years.

5. Participant is willing and able to undertake investigation of suspicious lesion (e.g. skin biopsy).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patient does not give informed consent.

2. Patient is unable or unwilling to have a full skin examination

3. Patient has a known past or current diagnosis of cognitive impairment

结果

主要结果指标

1. Diagnostic accuracy of the device when compared prospectively to a teledermatologist assesment [12 months]

Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm compared to the teledermatologist.

次要成果指标

1. Diagnostic accuracy of the device when used prospectively as compared to a dermatologist assessment [12 months]

Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm compared to the dermatologist.

2. Diagnostic accuracy of the device compared to teledermatologist, dermatologist and registrar using histopathology as 'gold standard' for any lesions biopsied. [12 months]

Sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm compared to histopathology of any lesions biopsied.

3. Appropriate selection of lesions by registrar compared to specialist dermatologists [12 months]

This will be assessed by comparing the lesions selected for review by the registrar with the lesions selected by the dermatologist.

4. Appropriateness of management by registrar compared to specialist dermatologists and impact AI might have on this. [12 months]

This will be assessed by comparing the registrars clinical assessment with the dermatologists clinical assessment and if providing the AI assessment in real time has an impact.

加入我们的脸书专页

科学支持的最完整的草药数据库

  • 支持55种语言
  • 科学支持的草药疗法
  • 通过图像识别草药
  • 交互式GPS地图-在位置标记草药(即将推出)
  • 阅读与您的搜索相关的科学出版物
  • 通过药效搜索药草
  • 组织您的兴趣并及时了解新闻研究,临床试验和专利

输入症状或疾病,并阅读可能有用的草药,输入草药并查看所使用的疾病和症状。
*所有信息均基于已发表的科学研究

Google Play badgeApp Store badge