中文(简体)
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2010-Jul

Cupping for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.

只有注册用户可以翻译文章
登陆注册
链接已保存到剪贴板
Myeong Soo Lee
Tae-Young Choi
Byung-Cheul Shin
Chang-ho Han
Edzard Ernst

关键词

抽象

Cupping is often used for stroke rehabilitation in Asian countries. Currently, no systematic review of this topic is available. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence for and against the effectiveness of cupping for stroke rehabilitation. Thirteen databases were searched from their inception through March of 2010 without language restrictions. Prospective clinical trials were included if cupping was tested as the sole treatment or as an adjunct to other conventional treatments for stroke rehabilitation. We found 43 potentially relevant articles, of which 5 studies including 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 2 uncontrolled observational studies (UOSs) met our inclusion criteria. Cupping was compared with acupuncture, electro-acupuncture and warm needling. Some superior effects of cupping were found in two of the RCTs when compared to acupuncture in hemiplegic shoulder pain and high upper-limb myodynamia after stroke. The other RCT failed to show favorable effects of cupping when compared to acupuncture and warm needling in patients with hemiplegic hand edema. The two UOSs reported favorable effects of cupping on aphasia and intractable hiccup after stroke. There are not enough trials to provide evidence for the effectiveness of cupping for stroke rehabilitation because most of the included trials compared the effects with unproven evidence and were not informative. Future RCTs seem warranted but must overcome the methodological shortcomings of the existing evidence.

加入我们的脸书专页

科学支持的最完整的草药数据库

  • 支持55种语言
  • 科学支持的草药疗法
  • 通过图像识别草药
  • 交互式GPS地图-在位置标记草药(即将推出)
  • 阅读与您的搜索相关的科学出版物
  • 通过药效搜索药草
  • 组织您的兴趣并及时了解新闻研究,临床试验和专利

输入症状或疾病,并阅读可能有用的草药,输入草药并查看所使用的疾病和症状。
*所有信息均基于已发表的科学研究

Google Play badgeApp Store badge