中文(繁體)
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000

Antibiotics for acute bronchitis.

只有註冊用戶可以翻譯文章
登陸註冊
鏈接已保存到剪貼板
J Smucny
T Fahey
L Becker
R Glazier
W McIsaac

關鍵詞

抽象

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic treatment of acute bronchitis, which is one of the most common illnesses seen in primary care, is controversial. Most clinicians prescribe antibiotics in spite of expert recommendations against this practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotic treatment for patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchitis.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles and the authors' personal collections up to 1996, and Scisearch from 1989 to 1996; we also wrote to study authors and drug manufacturers. An updated search of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE was conducted in 2000.

METHODS

Randomised trials comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo in acute bronchitis or acute productive cough without other obvious cause in patients without underlying pulmonary disease.

METHODS

At least two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors were contacted for missing data.

RESULTS

Nine trials involving over 750 patients aged eight to over 65 and including smokers and non-smokers were included. The quality of the trials was variable. A variety of outcome measures were assessed. Overall, patients receiving antibiotics had better outcomes than did those receiving placebo. At a follow-up visit, they were less likely to have a cough (relative risk 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.85; number needed to treat 5, 95% CI 3 to 14), show no improvement on physician assessment (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87; NNT 14, 95% CI 8 to 50), or have abnormal lung findings (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.89; NNT 11, 95% CI 6 to 50); and had shorter durations of cough (weighted mean difference 0.58 days, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.16 days), productive cough (WMD 0.52 days, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.03 days), and feeling ill (WMD 0.58 days, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.16 days). There were no significant differences regarding the presence of night cough, productive cough, or activity limitations at follow-up, or in the mean duration of activity limitations. The benefits of antibiotics were less apparent in a sensitivity analysis that included data from two other studies of patients with upper respiratory tract infections with productive cough. Antibiotic-treated patients reported significantly more adverse effects (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.14; number needed to harm 17, 95% CI 9 to 100) such as nausea, vomiting, headache, skin rash or vaginitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, antibiotics appear to have a modest beneficial effect in patients who are diagnosed with acute bronchitis. The magnitude of this benefit, however, is similar to that of the detriment from potential adverse effects. Furthermore, patients with other symptoms of the common cold who have been ill for less than one week are not likely to have any benefit from antibiotics.

加入我們的臉書專頁

科學支持的最完整的草藥數據庫

  • 支持55種語言
  • 科學支持的草藥療法
  • 通過圖像識別草藥
  • 交互式GPS地圖-在位置標記草藥(即將推出)
  • 閱讀與您的搜索相關的科學出版物
  • 通過藥效搜索藥草
  • 組織您的興趣並及時了解新聞研究,臨床試驗和專利

輸入症狀或疾病,並閱讀可能有用的草藥,輸入草藥並查看其所針對的疾病和症狀。
*所有信息均基於已發表的科學研究

Google Play badgeApp Store badge