中文(繁體)
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
General Dentistry

Clinical characterization and treatment outcome of patients with burning mouth syndrome.

只有註冊用戶可以翻譯文章
登陸註冊
鏈接已保存到剪貼板
Abdulaziz Hakeem
Sarah G Fitzpatrick
Indraneel Bhattacharyya
Mohammed N Islam
Donald M Cohen

關鍵詞

抽象

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a complex condition that affects the oral cavity, and data regarding effective treatment are limited. The purpose of this study was to explore the demographic and clinical information along with treatment outcomes for patients with BMS treated in a large referral center. Clinical records of the Oral Medicine Clinic at the University of Florida College of Dentistry were retrospectively searched for patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2014. Clinical data and treatment effectiveness were recorded. The records of 64 patients were included in this study. Women represented the majority of patients (81.2%), and the average age of all patients was 65 years. The most common systemic diseases were hypertension (59.4%), psycho-logical disorders (51.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (50.0%). The majority of patients were taking 5 or more medications (70.3%). Treatment frequency and efficacy were as follows: a-lipoic acid, 47.5% frequency (57 prescribed treatments of 120 total treatments) and lasting improvement reported with 45.6% of prescribed treatments; clonazepam, 17.5% frequency (21/120) and improvement reported with 33.0% of prescribed treatments; oral disintegrating clonazepam, 15.8% frequency (19/120) and improvement reported with 52.6% of prescribed treatments; and topical vitamin E, 5.0% frequency (6/120) and improvement reported with 33.0% of prescribed treatments. Chi-square analysis indicated that a significantly better response to treatment was reported by women (P = 0.010) and patients who reported involvement limited to the tongue rather than multifocal oral involvement (P = 0.040); however, the significant relationships did not persist when the variables were evaluated together using logistic regression analysis. No other clinical or demographic features showed significant differences in response to treatment. Although treatment effectiveness in this study was variable and limited for some regimens due to infrequent usage, many of the patients reported alleviation of symptoms.

加入我們的臉書專頁

科學支持的最完整的草藥數據庫

  • 支持55種語言
  • 科學支持的草藥療法
  • 通過圖像識別草藥
  • 交互式GPS地圖-在位置標記草藥(即將推出)
  • 閱讀與您的搜索相關的科學出版物
  • 通過藥效搜索藥草
  • 組織您的興趣並及時了解新聞研究,臨床試驗和專利

輸入症狀或疾病,並閱讀可能有用的草藥,輸入草藥並查看其所針對的疾病和症狀。
*所有信息均基於已發表的科學研究

Google Play badgeApp Store badge