中文(繁體)
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Periodontology 2000 1997-Oct

Is the chemical prevention of gingivitis necessary to prevent severe periodontitis?

只有註冊用戶可以翻譯文章
登陸註冊
鏈接已保存到剪貼板
A Sheiham

關鍵詞

抽象

Gingival inflammation seldom causes discomfort, social embarrassment or loss of function. As most sites with gingival inflammation do not progress to severe periodontal disease, gingivitis should not be considered a public health problem. Periodontitis is always preceded by gingivitis. But most gingivitis remains stable for years without progressing to periodontitis. The number of gingivitis sites that do convert is small. The levels of oral cleanliness achieved by the majority of populations in industrialized countries are below the threshold for severe destructive periodontal disease of personal and public health concern. Because methods of measuring the progression of periodontal disease are unreliable, definitive answers regarding conversion of gingivitis to severe periodontitis are lacking. Gingival inflammation frequently remains contained; most gingivitis remains stable for years without progressing to periodontitis. Decreasing gingivitis does reduce shallow pocketing, but the effect on severe periodontitis is not clear. Although the underlying justification for the reduction of plaque is to reduce gingival inflammation to prevent or reduce severe periodontitis and tooth loss, the basis for the approach is equivocal. A reasonably high level of plaque appears to be compatible with acceptably low levels of periodontal disease. Reducing nonspecific plaque levels to such levels is therefore a rational goal. The conventional methods of controlling periodontal disease involve mechanical removal of plaque and calculus. A complimentary ecological approach, using chemicals, would be to alter the environment of the pocket to prevent growth of putative pathogens. Any ecological approach should be sensitive to the dangers of disrupting the natural ecology of dental plaque. Some antimicrobial and antimetabolic agents such as fluoride, chlorhexidine and triclosan and zinc citrate can selectively suppress certain organisms or inhibit bacterial proteases implicated in tissue damage. The uncertainties about factors that convert gingival inflammation into periodontitis and periodontitis into severe periodontitis coupled with insufficient data from controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of chemical reduction of gingivitis to prevent severe periodontitis leads one to conclude that more research is required before the need for the chemical prevention of gingivitis to prevent severe periodontitis can be justified.

加入我們的臉書專頁

科學支持的最完整的草藥數據庫

  • 支持55種語言
  • 科學支持的草藥療法
  • 通過圖像識別草藥
  • 交互式GPS地圖-在位置標記草藥(即將推出)
  • 閱讀與您的搜索相關的科學出版物
  • 通過藥效搜索藥草
  • 組織您的興趣並及時了解新聞研究,臨床試驗和專利

輸入症狀或疾病,並閱讀可能有用的草藥,輸入草藥並查看其所針對的疾病和症狀。
*所有信息均基於已發表的科學研究

Google Play badgeApp Store badge